Civil aeronautics is in the midst of becoming a "mature" industry, with all the drawbacks that this entails. For decades, technological advances have been essentially incremental and the industry remains largely based on long-haul transport aircraft, with an emerging small jet component and a legacy of general aviation markets and products. But it has become increasingly clear that the industry cannot survive in this form.
The problems bedeviling the industry include pollution from emissions, increasing competition (particularly from communications technology, which has made business travel less necessary), air traffic control delays and inefficiencies, expanding noise restrictions, safety and security concerns and an overall business environment highly dependent on fuel prices. Solutions for all of these problems will probably require a complete reinvention of airplane technology.
The greatest hope is to be found in the ongoing information, bio-, nano-, energetics, and quantum technology revolutions. The IT revolution and associated "swarm" technologies enable the foremost solution: A "digital airspace" that is wholly automatic in terms of air traffic control, navigation and vehicle operations. Automatic aircraft operation is already becoming commonplace, but further increases will require a similarly automatic airspace.
ILLUSTRATION: LANCE
A digital airspace would in turn enable a complete revolution in personal mobility. Together with new technologies enabling Super-Short Takeoff and Landing (superSTOL) a digital airspace would put safe, quiet, affordable, street-in-front-of-your-house personal air vehicles within sight. So-called flying high mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HumVees) would create a superb transportation system for areas lacking intercity roads and eventually would supplement -- or perhaps supplant -- cars.
The variety of machines currently under study is accessible at www.roadabletimes.com.
The estimated worldwide market for such vehicles is in the range of US$1 trillion and their use would erode the scheduled domestic airline customer base by enabling 300km "commutes" and providing huge cost avoidance for roads and bridges.
Nevertheless, even given eventual development of an affordable, safe, fly/drive, airport-independent personal transportation system, there would still be a need to reinvent long-haul transport, especially for transoceanic flights. The current machines of this genre are direct descendants of the Boeing 707 and, after many decades of evolutionary improvement, this design approach simply lacks the scope to address the many problems that must be solved.
There are several alternatives, such as the blended wing body and strut/truss braced wings, which offer major potential increases in lift-to-drag ratio and improvements in structural weight fraction. Such improvements in these parameters would provide design margins to address most of the current problems, with the exception of emissions.
The issue of water emissions can be addressed by designs that enable long-haul aircraft to cruise below 9,000m. Such designs could be enabled by using circulation control for high lift and employed at cruising altitude for ride quality. The resulting STOL (short takeoff and landing) performance could also improve airport productivity.
On the other hand, emissions of carbon dioxide can be reduced simply by using biofuels, made from plants whose carbon dioxide "price" was paid via uptake of the very same gas from the atmosphere during their growth. Reductions of other greenhouse gases, such as nitric oxide, are attainable through clever combustor design.
Given the number and severity of problems currently plaguing civil aeronautics, the conventional approach of evolutionary changes to current paradigms is no longer sufficient. Instead, the industry must re-invent itself. With the advent of a digital airspace, and with appropriate research support, success would be both possible and likely.
Dennis Bushnell is chief scientist at the NASA Langley Research Center in Virginia. Copyright: Project Syndicate
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
RSS