Charitable smearing
Dear Johnny,
Frank Hsieh's (
Frank's campaign would make much more sense if he offered alternatives to Ma's polices or pointed out his weak points. However, with all these smear tactics -- starting with A-bian (
On the new allegation of a lack of transparency over dealings with the Taipei Fubon Bank during Ma's time as Taipei mayor: Why didn't the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) express its concern earlier? Now it just looks like they're doing it to smear Ma and make him a victim of a DPP conspiracy.
Erik Lenhart
Johnny replies: Frank Hsieh's campaign would make more sense if the DPP registered itself as a charity.
That way, after they lose the presidential election, DPP strategists will have something constructive to do with their time other than enquire into their rivals' passport status.
The road to an insurgency
Dear Johnny,
I'm another politically minded Jimmy Waiguoren who reads your column each week, but haven't bothered to write until now.
I was a little disturbed by an article in the Taipei Times entitled "Seeking younger voters, Hsieh hits YouTube Web site," (March 4, page 3), in which a poll conducted by the United Daily News suggested that 60 percent of respondents between 20 and 29 years of age support a Ma Ying-jeou-Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) ticket -- compared with 21 percent for Hsieh and Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌).
Putting aside the inaccuracies of these types of polls, it kind of got me thinking. First, if this is remotely true then it's a cause for concern.
Second, maybe Hsieh on YouTube isn't as silly as it sounds.
And third, how would it be if someone like yourself was able to contribute more directly to a dialogue with Taiwan's younger generation?
Being a student at National Chengchi University, I'd certainly be supportive of anything that raised awareness of the potential dangers of a KMT-dominated legislature and a KMT president.
Have you ever considered blogging your personal views in Chinese and English to make them more accessible? Or getting savvy like Hsieh and starting up a Facebook group with an unashamedly political bent?
Although too late for this election, I reckon something like this would make a valuable contribution to "keeping the bastards honest," as we say in Australia.
Karl Haby
Taipei
Johnny replies: I keep getting these e-mails from old school chums who have started up accounts on Facebook. Problem is, in order to look at them I have to open my own Facebook account. The hell with that!
The whole thing reeks of viral marketing and is only so different from spam. So you can count old Johnny out on that one.
As for a blog ... to be honest, Karl, blogs are like newspapers. The vast majority of the effort that goes into them is forgotten the day after, unless you write stuff so deep that people think your archives are worth poring over. But if you give me cash ...
Nah, for now I think I'll do something more constructive: Prepare an anti-communist guerrilla insurgency.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS