Charitable smearing
Dear Johnny,
Frank Hsieh's (
Frank's campaign would make much more sense if he offered alternatives to Ma's polices or pointed out his weak points. However, with all these smear tactics -- starting with A-bian (
On the new allegation of a lack of transparency over dealings with the Taipei Fubon Bank during Ma's time as Taipei mayor: Why didn't the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) express its concern earlier? Now it just looks like they're doing it to smear Ma and make him a victim of a DPP conspiracy.
Erik Lenhart
Johnny replies: Frank Hsieh's campaign would make more sense if the DPP registered itself as a charity.
That way, after they lose the presidential election, DPP strategists will have something constructive to do with their time other than enquire into their rivals' passport status.
The road to an insurgency
Dear Johnny,
I'm another politically minded Jimmy Waiguoren who reads your column each week, but haven't bothered to write until now.
I was a little disturbed by an article in the Taipei Times entitled "Seeking younger voters, Hsieh hits YouTube Web site," (March 4, page 3), in which a poll conducted by the United Daily News suggested that 60 percent of respondents between 20 and 29 years of age support a Ma Ying-jeou-Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) ticket -- compared with 21 percent for Hsieh and Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌).
Putting aside the inaccuracies of these types of polls, it kind of got me thinking. First, if this is remotely true then it's a cause for concern.
Second, maybe Hsieh on YouTube isn't as silly as it sounds.
And third, how would it be if someone like yourself was able to contribute more directly to a dialogue with Taiwan's younger generation?
Being a student at National Chengchi University, I'd certainly be supportive of anything that raised awareness of the potential dangers of a KMT-dominated legislature and a KMT president.
Have you ever considered blogging your personal views in Chinese and English to make them more accessible? Or getting savvy like Hsieh and starting up a Facebook group with an unashamedly political bent?
Although too late for this election, I reckon something like this would make a valuable contribution to "keeping the bastards honest," as we say in Australia.
Karl Haby
Taipei
Johnny replies: I keep getting these e-mails from old school chums who have started up accounts on Facebook. Problem is, in order to look at them I have to open my own Facebook account. The hell with that!
The whole thing reeks of viral marketing and is only so different from spam. So you can count old Johnny out on that one.
As for a blog ... to be honest, Karl, blogs are like newspapers. The vast majority of the effort that goes into them is forgotten the day after, unless you write stuff so deep that people think your archives are worth poring over. But if you give me cash ...
Nah, for now I think I'll do something more constructive: Prepare an anti-communist guerrilla insurgency.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS