I often hear TV news broadcasters use the word "isolationism" when criticizing the government's China policies. A closer look at the local TV news stations, however, indicates that it is the local media themselves that are suffering from isolationism.
I followed developments surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence. Apart from a few reports and commentaries in the print media, there was almost nothing on the TV news apart from scattered mentions.
I was thus forced to turn to CNN, the BBC and other international media outlets to gain a deeper understanding of events in Kosovo. This begs the question of where those who don't speak anything but Mandarin or Hoklo should turn. Could it really be that Kosovo's independence is of no interest at all to Taiwan, a nation that wants nothing more than to become a full member of the international community?
We will only be further disappointed if we look to TV news for information on other international news related to Taiwan.
A week ago, several former US government officials and experts on East Asian strategy in the Taiwan Policy Working Group published a report titled Strengthening Freedom in Asia: A Twenty-First Century Agenda for the US-Taiwan Partnership. In it, they make some important recommendations to the US government, such as affirming Taiwan's leading position in Asia in terms of technology, economy and democracy, confirming the strategic importance of Taiwan and advising that the US must not see Taiwan as an adjunct to Sino-US relations.
The contents of the report were worthy of deeper analysis. Unfortunately, most TV stations either ignored or only briefly reported it. I monitored one of the news stations most persistent in its critique of the government for almost an hour and it did not say a word about the report.
At a Washington seminar last month Bonnie Glaser of the Center for Strategic and International Studies mentioned a study conducted by Chinese academics on Taiwan's upcoming presidential election, citing their prediction that there might only be a narrow margin of 6 percent between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷). Perhaps I am ignorant and ill-informed, but I do not remember seeing this news reported on local TV.
Although such news events happen overseas and are categorized as "international news," they are closely related to Taiwan in light of their regional significance. But news stations either ignore them or only mention them briefly. If the media are not active even when dealing with news related to us, how would they deal with international news that appears to be unrelated to us?
As for the media channels that often push the government to loosen its cross-strait policy, they themselves seldom report China's situation and problems, and fail to give us an understanding of whether we are dealing with friends or foes. Regardless of whether we support unification or independence, shouldn't people on both sides of the Strait at least have some general understanding of each other?
According to research, narratives of more than 1,000 words cause impatience in most readers. Fewer people read newspapers now, and their in-depth grasp of news correspondingly weakens. Hence the electronic media have become the fastest and most convenient conduit for information.
But news stations are not fully realizing their responsibilities. They focus on political confrontation, social incidents and even entertainment gossip, bombarding the audience with the same news again and again.
Although some weekly news programs do occasionally cover international headlines, the proportion is still insignificant -- let alone the fact that some falsify news reports.
Even the most popular political commentary shows in Taiwan restrict themselves to the confrontation between the blue and green camps without a sense of right and wrong. Their general attitude is one of disinterest with any other issues.
No wonder the Taiwanese public is unaware of the international situation and has little awareness for matters that should be general knowledge. This is a result of the media's "isolationism," and their neglect to perform their duty to disseminate information.
Hsu Yu-fang is an associate professor of Chinese at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Perry Svensson and Eddy Chang
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS