Chinese Nationalist Party presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
According to Singapore's tourism bureau, 1.1 million Chinese tourists visited Singapore last year, which seems like quite a coincidence. On average, Singapore receives 3,000 tourists a day. However, Singapore's tourism bureau does not provide figures for the average amount spent per Chinese tourist.
According to information released last year by the UN World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), 31 million tourists departed from China in 2005, a 10 percent increase from 2004.
These individuals spent a total of US$21.7 million, or an average of US$700 each. As there is no data concerning the duration of their travels, we do not know whether they spent US$700 in three days or in seven. Also, we do not know how much of this sum is airfares, hotel fees or other costs.
During the same period, the average spend of Taiwanese tourists abroad was US$1,058, while tourists visiting Taiwan spent an average of US$1,400. Comparatively, the spending power of Chinese tourists is not particularly high.
Data from the Travel Industry Association of America indicated that 320,000 Chinese tourists traveled to the US in 2006. On average, their stay lasted 24 days, their airfares cost US$1,347 and their other expenditures reached US$5,131, making a total of US$6,478.
Deducting the cost of the airfare and dividing the remainder of their spending over a 24 day stay, their average daily spending was US$213. According to the US Department of Commerce, there will be an estimated 580,000 Chinese tourists in the US in 2011.
If Taiwan is opened up to Chinese tourists, would their average spending be nearer US$700 or US$6,000? Data from the Thai tourism bureau is worth considering.
In 2006, Chinese tourists stayed in Thailand for an average of 5.75 days, spending an average of US$146 per day. Even if we optimistically assume that this sum does not include airfares, their total spending would be US$840. If one budgeted for three meals a day, accommodation, entrance fees and transportation in Taiwan for US$146 a day, I wonder how much profit businesses would be able to generate?
According to information released by UNWTO last month, Macau received nearly 13 million tourists last year. According to Macanese academics, 90 percent of Macau's gamblers are Chinese. Yet, these same academics are not so keen to mention casinos as much as they are interested in promoting their cultural tourism industry.
Isn't it good to have so many Chinese gamblers? Not really. Academics worry that if Macau becomes equated too heavily with gambling, and Chinese policy were to change, then these tourists would disappear overnight. This is a considerable risk for Macau's tourism industry.
In addition, of the 26,000 jobs at six new casinos, local Macanese hold only 8,000. Macanese do not necessarily benefit from casinos, but must face the soaring prices brought by economic growth.
I support developing tourism and welcome Chinese tourists to Taiwan in the same way I welcome other tourists. However, I believe that overly high expectations are not helpful.
Chen Meng-mei is a professor at Ecole Hoteliere de Lausanne in Switzerland.
Translated by Angela Hong
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS