For cyclists in Taipei, two things changed this weekend. On Saturday, the Taipei MRT system opened 12 more stations to cyclists and their bikes, bringing the number of stations with bicycle access up to 27 of the 69 stops. Then, on Sunday, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC) announced new traffic rules for cyclists on city streets that will take effect at the end of this month.
The city's growing population of cyclists will no doubt welcome the chance to board the MRT with their bikes at more stations. Cycling has seen an explosion in popularity in recent years and this enthusiasm is as apparent in the heart of the nation's congested capital as anywhere.
On weekends, bike paths along the city's riverside parks draw cyclists of all ages. There is no doubt that the city has responded well to increasing interest, and its expanding network of bike paths has proved a popular investment.
Unfortunately, Taipei's bicycle infrastructure seems to revolve around one word: recreation.
Taipei's interest in cycling has a lot of potential. The nation's greenhouse gas emissions are climbing at a disturbing rate. At the same time, higher oil prices have brought down fuel sales as more people opt to leave their motor vehicles at home. Gasoline sales dropped 7.9 percent in January compared with last year, while passenger traffic on Taipei's MRT rose 7.4 percent. Reducing dependence on oil supplies and cutting the number of cars on Taipei's crowded streets is good news for a country that is having a difficult time cleaning up its act.
But in this context, biking -- a cheap and clean mode of transport -- remains a highly unattractive alternative for getting around the city, and officials have done little to coax cyclists out of the parks.
The MRT system remains closed to cyclists on weekdays and none of the major streets has bike lanes. Those taking Taiwan Railway Administration (TRA) trains into the city cannot bring bikes at all -- unless they are taken apart or folded. And while the administration will allow passengers to carry bicycles onto the trains for a trial run on Saturday, details of the scheme suggest that the TRA is hoping to tap into the popularity of recreational cycling, rather than promoting bicycles as an alternative mode of transport.
Measures that treat biking as a mode of transport are few and far between. But the MOTC's new regulations are at least an indication that officials are giving some thought to the matter.
The regulations will require bikes sharing the road with motor vehicles to follow traffic signs and lights. In addition, the ministry said bicycle crossings would be added at intersections -- as bikes may not use crosswalks -- and cyclists would be allowed to park their bikes in spots previously reserved for scooters.
But if biking is to gain ground as a common way of getting around -- as it has in many northern European cities -- officials will have to do more than offer the occasional piecemeal change in policy. The city needs a clear map to harness a well-timed trend and wean more residents off gas-guzzling vehicles.
Taipei's officials should be assessing the obstacles to this and promoting bikes as a viable option. The MRT system will expand considerably in the next few years, hopefully further reducing congestion in the streets.
With the right infrastructure for cyclists and increased access to the MRT, getting around town with nothing more than a bike and an EasyCard could become a practical alternative for many commuters.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS