For cyclists in Taipei, two things changed this weekend. On Saturday, the Taipei MRT system opened 12 more stations to cyclists and their bikes, bringing the number of stations with bicycle access up to 27 of the 69 stops. Then, on Sunday, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC) announced new traffic rules for cyclists on city streets that will take effect at the end of this month.
The city's growing population of cyclists will no doubt welcome the chance to board the MRT with their bikes at more stations. Cycling has seen an explosion in popularity in recent years and this enthusiasm is as apparent in the heart of the nation's congested capital as anywhere.
On weekends, bike paths along the city's riverside parks draw cyclists of all ages. There is no doubt that the city has responded well to increasing interest, and its expanding network of bike paths has proved a popular investment.
Unfortunately, Taipei's bicycle infrastructure seems to revolve around one word: recreation.
Taipei's interest in cycling has a lot of potential. The nation's greenhouse gas emissions are climbing at a disturbing rate. At the same time, higher oil prices have brought down fuel sales as more people opt to leave their motor vehicles at home. Gasoline sales dropped 7.9 percent in January compared with last year, while passenger traffic on Taipei's MRT rose 7.4 percent. Reducing dependence on oil supplies and cutting the number of cars on Taipei's crowded streets is good news for a country that is having a difficult time cleaning up its act.
But in this context, biking -- a cheap and clean mode of transport -- remains a highly unattractive alternative for getting around the city, and officials have done little to coax cyclists out of the parks.
The MRT system remains closed to cyclists on weekdays and none of the major streets has bike lanes. Those taking Taiwan Railway Administration (TRA) trains into the city cannot bring bikes at all -- unless they are taken apart or folded. And while the administration will allow passengers to carry bicycles onto the trains for a trial run on Saturday, details of the scheme suggest that the TRA is hoping to tap into the popularity of recreational cycling, rather than promoting bicycles as an alternative mode of transport.
Measures that treat biking as a mode of transport are few and far between. But the MOTC's new regulations are at least an indication that officials are giving some thought to the matter.
The regulations will require bikes sharing the road with motor vehicles to follow traffic signs and lights. In addition, the ministry said bicycle crossings would be added at intersections -- as bikes may not use crosswalks -- and cyclists would be allowed to park their bikes in spots previously reserved for scooters.
But if biking is to gain ground as a common way of getting around -- as it has in many northern European cities -- officials will have to do more than offer the occasional piecemeal change in policy. The city needs a clear map to harness a well-timed trend and wean more residents off gas-guzzling vehicles.
Taipei's officials should be assessing the obstacles to this and promoting bikes as a viable option. The MRT system will expand considerably in the next few years, hopefully further reducing congestion in the streets.
With the right infrastructure for cyclists and increased access to the MRT, getting around town with nothing more than a bike and an EasyCard could become a practical alternative for many commuters.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS