Just before the Lunar New Year, President Chen Shui-bian (
During the visit, Chen also proposed the Spratly Initiative, focusing on environmental protection and conservation. Taiwan has already initiated a marine national park at Dongsha, a concept that will later be expanded to include the Spratlys.
This initiative is a milestone in the nation's handling of the Spratly Islands issue, and a different approach to the military occupation and tourism promoted by neighboring countries.
Chen's visit to the islands has drawn various reactions both at home and abroad. Those who opposed the visits said it was an inappropriate time for Chen to declare Taiwan's sovereignty over Taiping Island and feared the move could increase tensions in the area.
There are also environmental activists who feel the construction of an airfield on the island could destroy the environment. The strongest international reaction against the visits came in the form of strong condemnations from the foreign ministries of the Philippines and Vietnam.
Looking at the facts, the criticism was predictable and is the result of the self-interest of the different parties.
Let us take a look at the interests of the other countries that have claimed sovereignty over parts of the Spratly Islands in recent years.
Chen is by no means the only national leader to have visited one of the islands. Malaysia's then-supreme head of state, Tuanku Azlan Muhibuddin Shah ibni al-Marhum and then-premier Mahathir bin Mohamad visited Swallow Reef, which is claimed by Malaysia, in 1992 and 1994 respectively.
The island has also been developed into a tourist and diving destination. Vietnamese defense minister Van Tien Dung visited Nanwei Island in 1985, and in 1982 Philippine prime minister Cesar Virata visited Thitu, or Zhongye, Island, which is occupied by the Philippines.
Nor is Taiwan the only country to have built an airfield on one of the Spratly Islands. In the early 1970s, the Philippines built an air strip on Thitu Island, and in 1992, Malaysia built one on Swallow Reef. In addition, China has built a helicopter landing site on Mischief Reef. In building an airfield on Taiping Island, Taiwan is in fact a latecomer.
Malaysia and Vietnam are at present trying to develop islands or reefs in the Spratly Islands for tourism. In particular, Malaysia even has travel agents working actively in Taiwan to attract tourists to Swallow Reef.
Vietnam has built a satellite receiver, a research station, a lighthouse and a harbor on the islands and reefs that it occupies, while China has built a meteorological and a hydrological station on Yongshu Reef.
To lessen tensions over the Spratlys, ASEAN and China signed the Declaration on the Code of Conduct on the South China Sea in 2002 without notifying Taiwan, seriously neglecting Taiwan's rights in this area. At the time, Taiwan issued a strong protest. Then, in 2004, China and the Philippines signed an agreement regarding the exploration of resources in the Spratlys, which drew protests from Vietnam. After talks, the three countries signed a tripartite agreement on joint marine seismic work in the South China Sea area of cooperation. The extent of the studies under this agreement was not disclosed.
This move seriously hurt Taiwan's rights in the Spratly Islands and strictly speaking, this kind of confidential agreement is not legally binding in the international community since it may have a negative impact on the rights of third parties.
Faced with these developments, how could Taiwan not act? Anyone with the barest understanding of how the international community works will see that if Taiwan had not taken action, it would be cut up in the slaughterhouse of international scheming and plotting. Taiwan's constructing an airfield on Taiping Island and Chen's visit cannot be described as Taiwan making a strong stand, but are rather necessary reactions to the international environment.
Taiwan does not offend others, but is still offended by them. If we stand for such behavior, then what else won't we stand for?
Taiwan's suggestion that the Spratlys become the target of environmental protection and conservation measures will lower tension over the islands, as other countries compete to develop oil and natural gas fields in their pursuit of natural resources. This kind of development will destroy the pristine Spratlys, biological habitats on the seabed as well as bird habitats on the islands.
In the 1930s, Japan built a light railway on Taiping and Spratly islands to facilitate the transportation of guano to the transport ships. Documentation shows an abundance of bird species at that time and that there were so many birds they would block the sky when taking flight. These days, there is scarcely a trace of birds on these islands and reefs because they have been scared away by regular military exercises.
Taiwan's call for environmental protection and conservation should be taken seriously by the neighboring countries. China, Vietnam and the Philippines should put an end to their surreptitious exploration of natural resources on these islands and partake in Taiwan's initiative. This would be an important step toward relaxing tension over the islands.
Chen Hurng-yu is a professor at Tamkang University's Graduate Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS