Just before the Lunar New Year, President Chen Shui-bian (
During the visit, Chen also proposed the Spratly Initiative, focusing on environmental protection and conservation. Taiwan has already initiated a marine national park at Dongsha, a concept that will later be expanded to include the Spratlys.
This initiative is a milestone in the nation's handling of the Spratly Islands issue, and a different approach to the military occupation and tourism promoted by neighboring countries.
Chen's visit to the islands has drawn various reactions both at home and abroad. Those who opposed the visits said it was an inappropriate time for Chen to declare Taiwan's sovereignty over Taiping Island and feared the move could increase tensions in the area.
There are also environmental activists who feel the construction of an airfield on the island could destroy the environment. The strongest international reaction against the visits came in the form of strong condemnations from the foreign ministries of the Philippines and Vietnam.
Looking at the facts, the criticism was predictable and is the result of the self-interest of the different parties.
Let us take a look at the interests of the other countries that have claimed sovereignty over parts of the Spratly Islands in recent years.
Chen is by no means the only national leader to have visited one of the islands. Malaysia's then-supreme head of state, Tuanku Azlan Muhibuddin Shah ibni al-Marhum and then-premier Mahathir bin Mohamad visited Swallow Reef, which is claimed by Malaysia, in 1992 and 1994 respectively.
The island has also been developed into a tourist and diving destination. Vietnamese defense minister Van Tien Dung visited Nanwei Island in 1985, and in 1982 Philippine prime minister Cesar Virata visited Thitu, or Zhongye, Island, which is occupied by the Philippines.
Nor is Taiwan the only country to have built an airfield on one of the Spratly Islands. In the early 1970s, the Philippines built an air strip on Thitu Island, and in 1992, Malaysia built one on Swallow Reef. In addition, China has built a helicopter landing site on Mischief Reef. In building an airfield on Taiping Island, Taiwan is in fact a latecomer.
Malaysia and Vietnam are at present trying to develop islands or reefs in the Spratly Islands for tourism. In particular, Malaysia even has travel agents working actively in Taiwan to attract tourists to Swallow Reef.
Vietnam has built a satellite receiver, a research station, a lighthouse and a harbor on the islands and reefs that it occupies, while China has built a meteorological and a hydrological station on Yongshu Reef.
To lessen tensions over the Spratlys, ASEAN and China signed the Declaration on the Code of Conduct on the South China Sea in 2002 without notifying Taiwan, seriously neglecting Taiwan's rights in this area. At the time, Taiwan issued a strong protest. Then, in 2004, China and the Philippines signed an agreement regarding the exploration of resources in the Spratlys, which drew protests from Vietnam. After talks, the three countries signed a tripartite agreement on joint marine seismic work in the South China Sea area of cooperation. The extent of the studies under this agreement was not disclosed.
This move seriously hurt Taiwan's rights in the Spratly Islands and strictly speaking, this kind of confidential agreement is not legally binding in the international community since it may have a negative impact on the rights of third parties.
Faced with these developments, how could Taiwan not act? Anyone with the barest understanding of how the international community works will see that if Taiwan had not taken action, it would be cut up in the slaughterhouse of international scheming and plotting. Taiwan's constructing an airfield on Taiping Island and Chen's visit cannot be described as Taiwan making a strong stand, but are rather necessary reactions to the international environment.
Taiwan does not offend others, but is still offended by them. If we stand for such behavior, then what else won't we stand for?
Taiwan's suggestion that the Spratlys become the target of environmental protection and conservation measures will lower tension over the islands, as other countries compete to develop oil and natural gas fields in their pursuit of natural resources. This kind of development will destroy the pristine Spratlys, biological habitats on the seabed as well as bird habitats on the islands.
In the 1930s, Japan built a light railway on Taiping and Spratly islands to facilitate the transportation of guano to the transport ships. Documentation shows an abundance of bird species at that time and that there were so many birds they would block the sky when taking flight. These days, there is scarcely a trace of birds on these islands and reefs because they have been scared away by regular military exercises.
Taiwan's call for environmental protection and conservation should be taken seriously by the neighboring countries. China, Vietnam and the Philippines should put an end to their surreptitious exploration of natural resources on these islands and partake in Taiwan's initiative. This would be an important step toward relaxing tension over the islands.
Chen Hurng-yu is a professor at Tamkang University's Graduate Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s