As the presidential debates were being held in Taiwan, Singapore was giving its people a NT$40 billion (US$1.3 billion) bonus, the Hong Kong government was asking itself what to do with its NT$400 billion surplus and new South Korean President Lee Myung-bak was announcing five new economic goals in the hope of initiating a 60-year period of progress.
Looking at this debate from abroad and in light of the possibility that Taiwan could be removed from the list of Asia's "four tigers," one could be forgiven for feeling a sense of loss.
How can Taiwan's less-than-stellar economic performance be improved? It's a good thing that both presidential candidates have returned to the issue of economic policy and given voters room for rational thought. Perhaps because they were restricted by the scope of the public's questions, their responses during the first debate were rather partial and segmented, lacking in strategic perspective and global vision.
Faced with the enormous potential of the Chinese market and entwined in the complex cross-strait relationship, both candidates have adopted stances that differ from that of President Chen Shui-bian (
The most urgent task for the next president is to prioritize security and prosperity, provide opportunities for Taiwanese industry and pool available resources to quickly develop a foundation for industry and thus create a Taiwanese economic renaissance.
Taiwan's economic future should be a major strategic focus. Rather than debating how many days of chartered flights should be allowed per week, we should rather seek to determine which sectors of industry Taiwan should focus on.
Here is what we are confronted with: The economic health of the information and electronics industries is influenced by the US economy, which has soured of late; the health of the tourism industry is predicated on various circumstances; and the financial services sector is limited by a mess of regulations and policies. As for the cultural industry, it is not yet mature enough to be industrialized.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said the government should raise the average income, for which investment and spending will be needed. In response, the KMT has put forward the "633" economic policy and the "i-Taiwan 12 Projects."
Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
But the government complains it is impoverished, so how can it make investments? If the government has no money, then how can it cut taxes? The average income in Hong Kong is higher than in Taiwan and the highest income taxation rate is 16 percent. No matter how hard it tries, Taiwan's tax cuts will never reach the majority of taxpayers in an M-shaped society.
The Hong Kong government has adapted quickly to new economic realities by redirecting itself toward the financial and logistical industries. Domestic policy has created a convenient transportation system and a cosmopolitan lifestyle. Recently, Hong Kong has become one of the world's three major financial centers, on par with London and New York.
Taiwan has more advantages than Hong Kong: high quality of professional skills, quality of life and a rich cultural foundations. But our election culture is too concerned with mud-slinging and fear-mongering. Perhaps Sunday's presidential debate allows for new hope.
Ted Chiou is a professor in the Department of Public Administration and Policy at National Taipei University.
Translated by Angela Hong
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s