Two years ago this week, I was at Taipei's 228 Museum preparing my radio program for Radio Taiwan International (formerly the Central Broadcasting System of China). The museum building had originally housed the Taiwan Broadcasting Company that had been set up by the Japanese, but was taken over by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) when Taiwan was "handed over" to Chiang Kai-shek's (
As I looked at the displays, I thought: "How ironic that I am now working for what once had been Chiang Kai-shek's Ministry of Truth," which years later was now trying to be a voice of the people.
As I walked through the museum, the stories I had read about "the incident" came to life through the photographs, drawings and eyewitness accounts of the scuffle that grew into a massacre. I was haunted by the voices, now preserved in digital audio, of those involved in the conflict:
First there were the excited, desperate voices of young Taiwanese. On the day the massacre began, they took over radio stations to send their message of distress to the world. They told the world of the drama unfolding on the streets of Taipei -- and called on their countrymen around Taiwan to protest the violence.
Then came the stern, authoritarian voices of the military rulers. In firm, measured tones, they announced the government's response to the crisis and warned people to stay home and behave.
As I looked and listened, I heard another voice in my head: the voice of a friend who clearly considered herself to be more Chinese than Taiwanese.
A few days earlier, she had told me: "Taiwanese don't want democracy. They want to be protected -- to be rich and to be protected."
At the time, all I could say was: "Protected from whom?"
The KMT's answer has always been that it was protecting Taiwan from "communist insurgents" from "the Mainland."
Indeed, "protecting Taiwan from the communists" was, from the beginning, Chiang's excuse for the 1947 massacre that by government estimates resulted in between 18,000 and 28,000 people killed during the weeks and months that followed the protests and riots on Feb. 28.
Chiang's son and heir, Chiang Ching-kuo (
And it was the explanation I always heard from KMT supporters every time the subject of Chiang Kai-shek came up in conversation: Chiang was protecting Taiwan. This was always followed by the argument that: "You do not understand Chinese affairs because you are not Chinese."
This non-explanation was the same one used by KMT chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
So perhaps I shouldn't have been surprised when I read a recent news story about Chiang Ching-kuo's son, John Chiang (
John Chiang has again lost his libel lawsuit against former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Yu Shyi-kun. John Chiang had filed the lawsuit after Yu said that Chiang Kai-shek was the "culprit" behind the 228 Incident.
The paper that published the story correctly noted that Chiang Kai-shek had "fled to Taiwan after losing a civil war to Mao Zedong's [
But the pro-KMT paper couldn't leave it there. It had to add that Chiang Kai-shek "is remembered by some as the man who laid the foundation for the island's economic prosperity and safeguarded it from Chinese invasion."
Well, no doubt he is remembered that way by John Chiang, Lien Chan (
But to anyone who bothers to learn about Taiwanese history, three things are abundantly clear:
The first is that it was the Japanese who -- in their 50-year occupation of Taiwan -- developed Taiwan's economy and civil society to a level unimagined in China.
The second is that the only things Chiang Kai-shek safeguarded Taiwan from was the prosperity delivered by the Japanese and the democracy dreamed of by Sun Yat-sen (
And finally, there is only one thing the people of Taiwan -- whether they call themselves "Taiwanese" or "Chinese" or "Aboriginal" -- ever needed to be protected from: Chiang Kai-shek and the KMT's reign of terror.
Stephen Nelson
Toronto, Canada
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS