South Korea's snub of President Chen Shui-bian's (
National Security Council (NSC) Secretary-General Mark Chen (陳唐山) and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) were turned away from the ceremony at the last minute after China threatened to withdraw its envoy and boycott the inauguration.
Reports have said that leaks from Taiwan about the "secret deal" regarding the duo's attendance enabled Beijing to pressure Seoul, while Mark Chen's sensitive position was also said to have been behind the rejection. The NSC chief's background as a prominent member of the independence movement would certainly not have helped matters.
More interesting was China's rejection of Wang, a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) figure. The fact that China was prepared to so publicly disrespect a member of the KMT -- which has, we must remember, a shady cooperation pact with the Chinese Communist Party -- speaks volumes about Beijing's intolerance of anything Taiwanese on the diplomatic front, and would seemingly discredit KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) plans, should he be elected president next month, to strike a "modus vivendi" to solve the cross-strait impasse and expand Taiwan's international space.
With everything that has happened in the past eight years, it would be easy to forget that Chen Shui-bian struck an equally conciliatory note with Beijing prior to and following his election in 2000.
Indeed, in his 2001 New Year speech, Chen offered to "seek permanent peace and build a new mechanism for political assimilation between the two sides" through "cross-strait trade, economic and cultural integration."
Back then, the president even said the "one China" concept would not present a problem as "the ROC [Republic of China] Constitution already delineated the nature of `one China.'" His only caveats were that Beijing respect the "ROC's survival space and its international dignity, and publicly renounce the use of force."
It would seem that Ma's novel cross-strait solution, now that he has promised not to talk about unification, is like old wine in a new bottle. Ma's Democratic Progressive Party rival Frank Hsieh (
The reaction here to China's latest act of suppression was also interesting, as it once again demonstrated the split personality of the KMT, with presentable figurehead Ma seemingly at odds with the party's pro-China core.
On the one hand, Ma, as he has done on several occasions, slammed China for marginalizing Taiwan, while on the other KMT Legislator Lin Yu-fang (
Not a word of criticism for Beijing from the patriotic Lin, but what should we expect when all Lin and his cronies have done in reaction to every diplomatic setback over the last eight years is snipe from the galleries?
Lin's gloating should serve as a timely reminder to all of the dangerous, pro-China baggage that will accompany Ma should he win the presidency, while China's behavior proves that, contrary to what it says on his campaign posters, a Ma victory next month would not -- diplomatically and internationally at least -- result in any substantive breakthrough.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS