At first glance, the resounding defeat of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's party in parliamentary elections might seem a setback to the US battle against terrorism.
After all, Musharraf has been a key ally in the fight against al-Qaeda. The election results could bring heavy public pressure to bear on the next Pakistani government to cooperate less with the US.
But there are also reasons for optimism. Pakistan appears headed toward its first elected civilian government after eight years of military rule. And while top Musharraf supporters were repudiated, the winning opposition parties are politically moderate. The vote was also a rebuke to Islamist parties, which lost control of a province where al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters have sought refuge.
The outcome holds the possibility of restoring order in a country whose population is weary of violence.
US President George W. Bush, on a trip to Africa, said: "It's now time for the newly elected folks to show up and form their government. The question then is: Will they be friends of the United States? I certainly hope so."
US officials were cautious in trying to piece together the Pakistan puzzle, including uncertainty over whether Musharraf can survive in power and who exactly will become the country's new prime minister and other top leaders.
"We need Pakistan as an important ally," Bush said. "We've got interests in helping make sure there's no safe haven from which people can plot and plan attacks against the United States of America and Pakistan."
Bush's trip was rocked by three foreign-policy developments in as many days: the Pakistani elections, Fidel Castro's resignation as president of Cuba after nearly half a century in power and Kosovo's declaration of independence from Serbia.
All have ramifications for US policy, with the Pakistani shake-up bearing directly on the US struggle against terrorism.
"Nothing is more important than giving the moderate majority a clear voice and a clear stake in the system," said Senator Joe Biden, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
He depicted the election as offering the US a chance to reshape its policy to one less centered on a single leader.
Musharraf and the US have a strained relationship at best.
Since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, the administration has lionized him as a key ally, a politically moderate leader capable of maintaining order in the world's only nuclear-armed Islamic country.
Under US prodding, he reversed Pakistan's support for the fundamentalist Taliban regime in neighboring Afghanistan and helped round up al-Qaeda militants and the Taliban tribesmen who helped them.
But his path to power -- through a coup in 1999 -- always seemed at odds with Bush's agenda to spread democracy. And some critics have questioned the depth of Musharraf's recent commitment to hunting down militants and pressing the search for Osama bin Laden. Since Sept. 11, the US has given Pakistan some US$10 billion in aid, most of it for the military.
Musharraf is extremely unpopular in his own country, even after he relinquished his rank of army general last year and retired from the military. That unpopularity has stoked anti-US feeling and threatens to erode Pakistan's cooperation in fighting terrorism.
Rick Barton, a Pakistan expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the role Musharraf will now play is an open question.
Should Musharraf voluntarily relinquish power, "it could lead to a peaceful transition and would signal the country has moved into another stage of political development," he said.
If he hangs on defiantly, it could "essentially stalemate the system," he said.
It is not clear just who Pakistan's next leaders will be -- or whether the new parliament could force Musharraf out.
The parties of slain former prime minister Benazir Bhutto and former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, the leader Musharraf ousted, won enough seats to form a new government, though they will likely fall short of the two-thirds needed to impeach the president.
Sharif on Tuesday called again for Musharraf to step down. Musharraf spokesman Rashid Qureshi said, however, that the president intends to work with the new government and will serve out his term, which expires in 2012.
Though he was unclear what that new government will look like, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said Musharraf's party is not the only potential partner.
Bhutto's party, in particular, "feels acutely the threat from violent extremists and terrorism, having had their party leader recently assassinated," McCormack said.
Michael O'Hanlon, a foreign policy expert at the Brookings Institution, said the shake-up in Pakistan's government "could be one of those counterintuitive things where someone who seems less hardline and pro-Western, who is a little less to our liking, may end up doing a better job" in rounding up terrorists. "I wouldn't rule that possibility out at all."
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
RSS