The rehearsal studio and warehouse of Taiwan's national treasure -- Cloud Gate Dance Theater (雲門舞集) -- in Bali Township (八里), Taipei County, was devastated by a fire last week. The finest of the troupe's work accumulated over 35 years was destroyed. This conflagration not only exposed the hardships suffered by artists working long-term in near poverty, but also highlighted the cultural oversight typical in many industrial cities and nations in a state of transition.
Taiwan's cultural policy is a typical example of many developing or newly industrialized countries: Culture is a means of propagating ideology or to promote the image that all is well. Since its main purpose is decorative, culture often lags at the tail end of national development projects and its budget is ridiculously small. Even if individuals or groups in the cultural industry receive a pittance of public funding, death is often preferable as they are frequently forced to work under torturous conditions to meet a deadline despite inadequate resources.
But the problems highlighted by the Cloud Gate fire go beyond the issue of cultural subsidies: They draw attention to the value that is structurally assigned to cultural policy.
National policymakers are disdainful of the arts and culture because they perceive them as mere cosmetics, overlooking the fact that they could be a driving force for development of a city or the country. Like a locomotive engine, culture can lead and promote new developments and bring in unlimited economic value. Indeed, it can forge a creative urban environment that gestates culturally rich lifestyles.
As one of the four Asian tigers, Singapore's distinguishing characteristic in its globalization strategy since the 1990s has been to re-evaluate the development potential of culture. After the departure of the colonial power, Singapore harnessed a cultural industry built around a strong ethnic Chinese identity that had resisted foreign powers and managed to gain independence, while at the same time imbibing and promoting the multicultural characteristics of a multi-ethnic society.
After the meteoric rise of China's economy, Singapore took advantage of its geographical and cultural proximity to China to transform and reinvent its identification with Chinese ethnicity, develop industries associated with ethnic Chinese culture, including immigrant history, costumes, architecture and food. Singapore established Chinese-language education centers and contemporary Chinese studies institutes, which are actively exported to the world at large. Over the past 20 years, Singapore has almost become the place where Westerners gain an understanding of contemporary China: In the English-speaking world, Singapore has obtained a unique right to interpret Chinese culture and produced limitless potential for development and tourism for the nation. Singapore's strategy to globalize its culture has also indirectly helped it define its position in the new Asia.
Some may have visited San Francisco, on the other side of the Pacific, and were entranced by its layered, winding and profuse urban sights. But prior to the 1960s, San Francisco was merely a derelict, run-down, mining town, much like Jiufen (
The habitation and cultural, creative activities of artists became the basis from which a flourishing San Francisco cityscape war born. Even more interestingly, the innovative climate of a city that has amassed the essence of counterculture movements and artistic energy has become an inspiration for Silicon Valley's abundant supply of outstanding technical talent.
Culture is not only good business. Aside from being the developmental drive for a new urban economy, it is also an expression of the national spirit and a force that defines its residents' identity. Singapore's globalized strategy has successfully allowed the politics of cultural identity to advance from being an expression of opposition to becoming an industry, whereas San Francisco's creative environment has forged a superb educational and cultural environment which people are more than willing to inhabit.
Groups such as the Cloud Gate Dance Theatre or the Tsai Jui-yueh Dance Research Institute (蔡瑞月舞蹈研究社), which are capable of artistically rendering the history of the human rights movement, as well as the ethnic and national identity of an immigrant society, should be considered national treasures that deserve to be preserved and encouraged. They should be appropriately installed in the urban network as a fount of creativity.
Producers of arts and culture are the genies of the nation's future development. It is through their magic that ugly industrial towns are made beautiful and transformed into a sustainable homeland. Only by thoroughly revising cultural policies can we make sense of the Promethean fire of Cloud Gate in the hope that it will help create Taiwan's next cultural hope.
Sabina Sun is a special lecturer at the National Taiwan University of Arts.
Translated by Angela Hong
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
RSS