Florian Henckel Von Donners-marck's film The Lives of Others won an Oscar for best foreign language film of 2006 and recently picked up a British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) award for best non-English language film.
While the film takes place in East Berlin, it resonates soundly in Taiwan because it provides a strong, sobering insight into what life was like under a totalitarian regime.
The regime was the German Democratic Republic, but the lack of human rights, lack of press freedom and the constant surveillance by an elaborate system of spies and informants could apply to any one-party state dictatorship, including Taiwan during the years of the Chiang dictatorship and its Taiwan Garrison Command.
Visiting the former East Germany today, it is hard to imagine the brutal and fear-infested atmosphere that existed when it was under communist rule.
Similarly, visitors to Taiwan today will find it hard to imagine the fear and suspicion that existed here some 20 years ago under martial law.
This contrast is what drives the film and makes it all the more poignant.
In the film a Stasi agent, Gerd Wiesler, is directed by his chief and former classmate Anton Grubitz to find evidence that could convict a popular playwright and director Georg Dreyman of disloyalty to the state.
Grubitz's motivation comes more from the desire for promotion and power than any real ideological conviction.
As for true ideological conviction, certainly the rare combination of personal honesty, support of the regime and intelligence are hard to find in any one-party state dictatorship.
One commentator suggests it is possible to combine two of the above in such a state, but not all three. In the film, Wiesler tries to combine all three but suffers as a result.
To see how this plays out, and how the lives of others are affected and destroyed by the Stasi's methods, you must see the film.
At the height of its Cold War power, the Stasi had more 100,000 employees, more 200,000 informants and files on more than 6 million people. The extent of its abuse of citizens' rights and its spying network only became evident after the Berlin Wall fell in November 1989 and East Berliners took control of the Stasi headquarters in January 1990 to prevent Stasi personnel from destroying the records.
Parallels abound between the once one-party state of East Germany and its methods of control and those of Taiwan. In both, the existence of that rare combination of personal honesty, support of the regime and intelligence was hard to find.
However, Taiwan, which has now achieved its own democracy, suffers as a result of one glaring difference: The Stasi were prevented from destroying most of the damning evidence against it. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), however, has had more than 20 years to sanitize its Martial Law era record.
Even now the party still blocks any accounting of its stolen assets and past crimes.
As the film ends, Dreyman has managed to survive because Wiesler withheld some damning evidence against him. Dreyman meets Hempf, a profiteering former minister turned successful businessman.
Hempf -- as if in justification for his continued wealth and position -- says to him: "Our former little republic [East Germany] wasn't all that bad, was it?"
Dreyman answers: "To think, people like you once ruled our country."
In Taiwan, people like Hempf not only still rule, but aspire to higher office.
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS