A fire on Feb. 11 burned the Cloud Gate Dance Theater's painstaking efforts to the ground and, at the same time, exposed the government's indifference to arts and culture. Why was the internationally renowned troupe forced to reside in an unsafe and illegal sheet metal building for 15 years? When such an influential and well-known arts group still struggles over production funding and warehousing location, it means that it is even more difficult for other artists to earn the recognition of society a large.
At the end of the 1990s, through the intervention of artists and the Taiwan provincial government's department of culture, unused warehouses and factories belonging to state enterprises were released according to a policy for space reuse. Examples such as the Huashan Culture Park, or Stock 20 in the Taichung Railway Station, opened their doors to artists under this policy. In 2001, the Council of Cultural Affairs' Chen Yu-chiou (
Operations at those locations was contingent on government budgets that were entrusted to officials who organize arts and culture events. In other words, aside from the maintenance of physical structures, the government had to create an operational budget and organize events to attract viewers.
However, recent research has shown that some of these locations were remote and only received 3,000 to 4,000 visitors annually.
What if these spaces of "cultural consumption" were changed into areas of "cultural production"?
As a result of industrial transformation and some sectors of the industry relocating abroad, Taiwan has many empty factories and offices. If government could free up these locations through legislation and, following some maintenance work to ensure safety, lease them at affordable rates to arts groups for long-term residency, it would address safety concerns, eliminate the need for annual events budgets and generate a steady income.
This mechanism would help concentrate more arts and cultural energy and encourage autonomous economic development. Although "cultural production" would not immediately offset the costs of other investments, if this gesture of goodwill managed to produce 10 groups of international status over a decade, as well as dozens of locally recognized troupes or arts communities, the added value would most certainly justify the investment.
Western countries often provide stable creative environments and resources for emerging arts groups, which allows them to expand their influence and enrich the culture.
In Asia, there have been many similar examples in recent years. In 1985, to promote national arts and culture, the Singaporean government promoted the "Art Housing Scheme" to help arts groups with good levels of performance rent space as long-term bases from the national property administration. A portion of the rent is sponsored by Singapore's National Arts Council, thus sparing arts groups concerns over high commercial rates and allowing them to focus on their art.
The Hong Kong Arts Development Council has implemented a similar scheme to assist arts groups seeking to obtain space through a periodic exchange of contracts, such as in the old cattle quarantine station, which is now the Cattle Depot Artist Village.
The Yokohama government in Japan acquired empty space and used lower rents to attract artists, inviting them to develop Yokohama's image as a city of creativity.
Last year, Taipei City also put forward an arts space network, which arranged for local communities to release seven old dormitories, now known as O Space, on Zhonghua Road, to long-term residency for arts groups, thus planting the prototype of an arts community.
This kind of cooperation allows property owners and arts groups to help each other fulfil their development goals.
If the fire at Cloud Gate fails to awaken politicians to their responsibility for the nation's cultural development, then people involved in the arts and culture will need to mobilize to get their attention. The National Property Administration, the Council of Cultural Affairs and local governments should approach the cultural spaces policy with a view to fostering the creative industry, rather than lavish their money on local cultural events.
Margaret Shiu is director of the Bamboo Curtain Studio and Bamboo Culture International in Taipei.
Translated by Angela Hong
US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing. For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability. Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and
Chinese Ministry of National Defense spokesman Wu Qian (吳謙) announced at a news conference that General Miao Hua (苗華) — director of the Political Work Department of the Central Military Commission — has been suspended from his duties pending an investigation of serious disciplinary breaches. Miao’s role within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) affects not only its loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but also ideological control. This reflects the PLA’s complex internal power struggles, as well as its long-existing structural problems. Since its establishment, the PLA has emphasized that “the party commands the gun,” and that the military is
US president-elect Donald Trump in an interview with NBC News on Monday said he would “never say” if the US is committed to defending Taiwan against China. Trump said he would “prefer” that China does not attempt to invade Taiwan, and that he has a “very good relationship” with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Before committing US troops to defending Taiwan he would “have to negotiate things,” he said. This is a departure from the stance of incumbent US President Joe Biden, who on several occasions expressed resolutely that he would commit US troops in the event of a conflict in
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During