When Chinese Olympic officials said in a statement last week that politics doesn't belong on the sports field we were reminded of words spoken by International Olympic Committee (IOC) vice president Thomas Bach back in 2001: "All the members [of the IOC] are well aware that this election has a political significance and for all the members I have spoken to, human rights is an issue."
Bach thought at the time that the Olympics would have a positive influence on China's human rights record. But for a while it seemed the reverse was happening, as Olympic organizations in some Western countries seemed to be taking a page from China's totalitarian notebook.
The New Zealand Olympic Committee added a clause to athlete contracts a while ago banning them from making political statements or demonstrating while in Beijing -- whether protesting on their own or responding to questions from journalists. It reneged on that position yesterday, however, in a U-turn that opposition Green MP Keith Locke welcomed, saying it would give New Zealand athletes the right to speak freely about what they saw in China.
This development followed on the heels of the British Olympic Association backing down last week from plans to add their own clauses to athlete's contracts limiting free speech.
Olympic Charter Rule 51 forbids any kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda within any Olympic sites, venues or other areas. Protesting outside "designated areas," however, is allowed and this is what the UK and New Zealand Olympic committees were attempting to curb by forcing their athletes to sign the contracts. At stake is the fear that Olympians are going to use Beijing as a venue to criticize China over its human rights abuses in Darfur and Tibet, among a host of other issues.
But it wasn't only organizations that sought to muzzle athletes. Milan Zver, sports minister for Slovenia, told athletes not to raise human rights and other sensitive political issues during the Olympics because "sports are too important to use as a political instrument."
This is really no different than doing business in China: Make any kind of investment you want, but don't discuss any political issues while doing so. In this sense, the Olympics are business as usual.
Jonathan Edwards and Matthew Pinsent, two respected British Olympic champions, said they supported the right of athletes to condemn China's record on human rights and foreign policy. American gold medalist Joey Cheek agrees. Last week the Team Darfur member said that countries choose to stage the Games not just because they like sports but also because they want to showcase their country, people, culture and political systems.
There will be a predictable backlash by athletes complaining that they don't want to feel pressured to answer questions of a political nature posed by the international media. And they shouldn't feel compelled to do so. Athletes are as free to comment on human rights abuses as they are to keep silent.
Meanwhile, ordinary Chinese are appalled that athletes from other countries would want to protest against China, or that a celebrity as famous as Steven Spielberg would boycott the Games -- assuming that they have heard the news at all.
Beijing's theme for the Olympics is "One world, one dream." As countries begin to abandon the "see no evil" policy for athletes, Beijing is about to discover that while we may inhabit one world, the dreams are many.
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday named US Representative Mike Waltz, a vocal supporter of arms sales to Taiwan who has called China an “existential threat,” as his national security advisor, and on Thursday named US Senator Marco Rubio, founding member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China — a global, cross-party alliance to address the challenges that China poses to the rules-based order — as his secretary of state. Trump’s appointments, including US Representative Elise Stefanik as US ambassador to the UN, who has been a strong supporter of Taiwan in the US Congress, and Robert Lighthizer as US trade
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
On Friday last week, tens of thousands of young Chinese took part in a bike ride overnight from Henan Province’s Zhengzhou (鄭州) to the historical city of Kaifeng in search of breakfast. The night ride became a viral craze after four female university students in June chronicled their ride on social media from Zhengzhou in search of soup dumplings in Kaifeng. Propelled by the slogan “youth is priceless,” the number of nocturnal riders surged to about 100,000 on Friday last week. The main road connecting the two cities was crammed with cyclists as police tried to maintain order. That sparked
RSS