"Liberty, combat, philanthropy" might be a good motto for Taiwan.
Liberty is a question to be dealt with as a matter of the utmost urgency -- as a legacy from the people who sacrificed their life for it, like so many lilies engraved on the road of Taiwan's human rights.
Liberty can be compared to a strong but sensitive woman, ready to fight for her children and family, her friends and neighbors and the natural environment as well. She can cook and feed, before transmitting her knowledge to her children; she also reads and inspires, and teaches her children accordingly. She is the weapon against cold-blooded rationalism and greed for money that infects so many people nowadays and destroys nature.
Liberty is an entity whose name deserves to be written everywhere, as Paul Eluard urged in his poem, "on all pages and screens, on the horizon too and the wings of birds." Why is it so important to write her name everywhere? To free yourself from the old yokes -- masters and commanders -- and the new yokes, which are money and materialism.
Every Taiwanese has the right to be the master of his or her fate. Why do we need the Liberty Square instead of Chiang Kai-shek Memorial? Because Liberty Square represents the past, the present and the future of Taiwanese seeking liberty.
Through long and gruesome combat, the Taiwanese people conquered and seized their freedom from the hands of the Japanese colonizers, then conquered a second time and seized it from the hands of a dictatorship. Yet this fight is far from over. Even more challenges wait ahead, in the form of imperialistic nations. The Taiwanese will have to fight for their freedom, and this is their mission. Such combat is unavoidable.
Many Taiwanese are wise; they have deep emotions and knowledge; they have integrated the ancient wisdom but they are too shy or too modest, sometimes even too self-effacing to think they can innovate; so they let it manifest in a sort of fatalistic way. That's the reason why "combat" would be the second term of the motto. Combat led by artists.
When it comes to a combative soul, who is more appropriate than the artist to arouse the spirit of a population? As Wassily Kandinsky, who painted the first modern abstract paintings said, the artist has the social mission to refine the human spirit. Living in osmosis with the nature, he/she is inspired by her and feels a deep emotion that makes him/her create a work of art. This work of art transmits a strong spiritual force to those who view it and a strong desire to achieve something good for the community. French painter Gustave Moreau's Prometheus ignites in everybody's heart a strong desire to resist against oppression and achieve something for humanity in spite of the terrible suffering this might bring.
Born from the interactions between artist and spectator is the last term of the motto, "philanthropy." Famous thinker Zhang Zai (張載) of the Song Dynasty once said "all the people are my fellows and all things are my companions." This phrase represents philanthropy. Indeed, a fight for liberty involves not only oneself or one's family, but also all the people living in Taiwan and the land, mountains and rivers as well. Freedom through combat, philanthropy through freedom: This is the spirit we should embrace.
Sylvie Allassonniere
Taipei
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS