CHINESE NATIONALIST PARTY (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) recently made public a white paper on culture, which was a very positive campaign strategy. Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Frank Hsieh (
When Ma ran for Taipei Mayor in 1998, he mentioned culture in an action white paper, promoting the establishment of Taipei public radio, the strengthening of media coverage for local communities and the disadvantaged as well as more content aimed at public welfare. These are all ideas which have yet to be realized and are still needed in Taiwan.
Hsieh seems to have more cultural policies and results. In the 1990s, Hsieh started the Chinese-language New Cultural Monthly magazine.
During deliberations over the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法) and Public Television Act (公共電視法), Hsieh wanted to implement special taxes for cable television operators which could help subsidize cultural projects like public television. His arguments remain valid today.
Hsieh also contributed progressive measures for public television, although later, during a legislative assessment, the version he had proposed was not supported.
Ma has praised Hsieh for his film initiatives and says he plans to imitate them.
During Hsieh's one-year term as premier, he proposed a special budget for Taiwan Public Television Service (PTS), and legal amendments to laws regulating this service, though his successors failed to push these measures through.
It remains to be seen what policies on Taiwanese culture will be proposed and implemented by the future head of government or ruling party, especially in the field of public broadcasting.
Currently, there are three important proposals still in the Cabinet.
Apart from the drafts on the culture and creative industry development act and the digital content industry development act approved by the Cabinet in August and September last year, there is still a draft for a communication broadcast management act, which would incorporate the Telecommunications Act (電信法), the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣電法), the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣電法) and the Radio and Television Act (廣播電視法); this draft has been passed by the National Communications Commission, but awaits Cabinet assessment.
Of course, the new act for regulating public television proposed by Hsieh is more urgent, as it can respond to two new situations.
First, it can deal with the television budget and resources of the Overseas Compatriot Affairs Commission (僑委會), the Council for Hakka Affairs (客委會) and the Council of Indigenous Peoples (原民會), as well as the Chinese Television System, which was delegated to take over management of PTS last year, in accordance with the law.
Second, the new act can allow the sharing of resources between radio and television.
Unfortunately, this practical and forward-planning act still rings hollow due to administrative indolence.
Whether Ma or Hsieh is elected in March, both have had a clear perspective and valuable input in cultural affairs and policies. Hopefully we will begin to see more compelling discussions on culture and policy in the political arena.
Feng Chien-san is a professor in the Department of Journalism at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY ANGELA HONG
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS