"Integrity is honesty in action" is an aphorism Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential hopeful Ma Ying-jeou (
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
After Hsieh claimed the next day that he knew Ma's green card number, Ma called an emergency press conference later that night and said he did obtain a green card in 1977 to facilitate his application for student loans and for employment purposes. Ma said that both his and his wife's green cards were invalidated in the mid-1980s when they applied for visas at the American Institute in Taiwan to travel to the US.
Whether Ma is still a holder of a valid green card as the Hsieh camp alleges remains to be seen, but that's beside the point.
What is relevant is how Ma responds to such enquiries and what kind of crisis management skills he has for issues of genuine importance.
When first confronted by Hsieh with the green card question, Ma resorted to a rhetorical game of half-truths.
Telling a half-truth -- and then admitting it -- suggests Ma can all too easily turn an easy yes-or-no question into a snowballing headache.
If Ma had simply said that he once possessed a green card, then the matter would have ended there.
The way Ma has been coping with potential crises lately elicits deja vu.
Back in late 2006, when Ma was faced with accusations of embezzling his special allowance fund during his stint as Taipei mayor from 1998 to 2006, he said he was scrupulous in separating public funds from private interests.
It was only after he was indicted for embezzlement that he changed his statement, arguing that he understood the special allowance fund was a "substantial subsidy" that formed part of his official income.
Long a darling of the press, Ma has been able to maintain a clean-cut image through sophisticated image manipulation. As a result, it often seems like Hsieh is running against a pop idol rather than a presidential candidate.
As a democratic country, Taiwan no longer needs an idol to worship as it did under the KMT's authoritarian regime.
It is time to scrutinize Ma for the integrity and leadership skills needed to lead the country.
What Taiwan wants is a candidate with integrity to win the election on March 22 -- not celebrities who crack under precious little pressure.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS