During his 1960 presidential campaign, former US president John F. Kennedy once said: "I'm the only person standing between Richard Nixon and the White House."
In the same vein, numerous Taiwanese believe that the DPP standard bearer Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) is the only person standing between Beijing and Taiwan.
Duplicating the KMT legislative victory in the presidential contest would remove all obstacles for the KMT to bring Taiwan into Beijing's orbit. From Beijing's perspective, the KMT's full control of Taiwan would translate into the elimination of any excuse the KMT has for not complying with Beijing's wishes, given its pact with the Chinese Communist Party.
Stealth unification would be plausible given KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) "neither domestic nor international" but open-border policy to China and his intention to integrate Taiwan's economy with China's as a foot in the door for his and his party's ultimate goal of unifying Taiwan with China.
That would be the case if Beijing is patient.
If it's not, a Beijing-instigated implementation of a KMT version of the "Anti-Secession" Law could destabilize Taiwan for years to come.
This coming election's implication on Taiwan has undoubtedly multiplied on account of the legislative poll's dramatic outcome. People could be choosing between constantly resisting the coercion of Beijing and irreversibly succumbing to it.
The impact on Taiwan's future sovereignty of the two partys' platforms deserves a thorough public airing. Imperative then is a Hsieh-Ma debate on the specific topic of sovereignty.
In the absence of a complete trust and understanding of Ma and the KMT's designs for Taiwan's future, the public might opt for the safe harbor of checks and balances and, as a result, Ma wouldn't get the collective nod.
Ma's loss would, in addition to slowing the momentum of Taiwan's moth-to-fire tilt toward China, provide a reality check to the KMT's party-state fantasy and give KMT legislators pause enough that undemocratic bills like the "money-pit" and the Anti-Secession Law wouldn't see the light of day.
Should voters, seeking balance after drubbing the DPP, swing to the other extreme of the pendulum and decidedly reject Ma with a huge margin, a transformation of the KMT might even follow.
Stunned by the steep reversal of fortune and desperate to exit permanent opposition status, the KMT might decide to shed all election "baggage" and drop its prefix of "Chinese" to become the Taiwanese Nationalist Party for a complete "localization" make-over.
What could materialize is a political landscape with two major Taiwanese parties operating under an equitable political environment free of party assets disparity and systematic one-sided advantage while both vying for the coveted opportunity to serve Taiwan in lieu of foreign interests.
This in turn would ensure national unity as well as the nation's long-term stability, a development that should restore Taiwan's faith in democracy.
The March poll could evolve into an unprecedented opportunity for Taiwanese to right the ship they call home.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS