During his 1960 presidential campaign, former US president John F. Kennedy once said: "I'm the only person standing between Richard Nixon and the White House."
In the same vein, numerous Taiwanese believe that the DPP standard bearer Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) is the only person standing between Beijing and Taiwan.
Duplicating the KMT legislative victory in the presidential contest would remove all obstacles for the KMT to bring Taiwan into Beijing's orbit. From Beijing's perspective, the KMT's full control of Taiwan would translate into the elimination of any excuse the KMT has for not complying with Beijing's wishes, given its pact with the Chinese Communist Party.
Stealth unification would be plausible given KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) "neither domestic nor international" but open-border policy to China and his intention to integrate Taiwan's economy with China's as a foot in the door for his and his party's ultimate goal of unifying Taiwan with China.
That would be the case if Beijing is patient.
If it's not, a Beijing-instigated implementation of a KMT version of the "Anti-Secession" Law could destabilize Taiwan for years to come.
This coming election's implication on Taiwan has undoubtedly multiplied on account of the legislative poll's dramatic outcome. People could be choosing between constantly resisting the coercion of Beijing and irreversibly succumbing to it.
The impact on Taiwan's future sovereignty of the two partys' platforms deserves a thorough public airing. Imperative then is a Hsieh-Ma debate on the specific topic of sovereignty.
In the absence of a complete trust and understanding of Ma and the KMT's designs for Taiwan's future, the public might opt for the safe harbor of checks and balances and, as a result, Ma wouldn't get the collective nod.
Ma's loss would, in addition to slowing the momentum of Taiwan's moth-to-fire tilt toward China, provide a reality check to the KMT's party-state fantasy and give KMT legislators pause enough that undemocratic bills like the "money-pit" and the Anti-Secession Law wouldn't see the light of day.
Should voters, seeking balance after drubbing the DPP, swing to the other extreme of the pendulum and decidedly reject Ma with a huge margin, a transformation of the KMT might even follow.
Stunned by the steep reversal of fortune and desperate to exit permanent opposition status, the KMT might decide to shed all election "baggage" and drop its prefix of "Chinese" to become the Taiwanese Nationalist Party for a complete "localization" make-over.
What could materialize is a political landscape with two major Taiwanese parties operating under an equitable political environment free of party assets disparity and systematic one-sided advantage while both vying for the coveted opportunity to serve Taiwan in lieu of foreign interests.
This in turn would ensure national unity as well as the nation's long-term stability, a development that should restore Taiwan's faith in democracy.
The March poll could evolve into an unprecedented opportunity for Taiwanese to right the ship they call home.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS