WHAT EXACTLY is the US' China policy, if there is one? A dissection of recent statements by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates doesn't leave one any the wiser.
Take the case of Taiwan, for instance. In her statement at a news conference, Rice sharply criticized Taiwan for its impending referendum to apply for UN membership under the name "Taiwan," calling it "a provocative policy."
"It unnecessarily raises tensions in the Taiwan Strait and it promises no real benefits for the people of Taiwan on the international stage," she said.
In a different context, Gates said at a Pentagon news conference, referring to his recent China visit and his talks in Beijing with his hosts, that "as long as they [Beijing] continued to build up their forces on their side of the Taiwan Strait, we would continue to give Taiwan the resources necessary to defend itself."
He said China's explanation that the recent cancelation of port visits by US warships to Hong Kong was linked to sales of US arms to Taiwan without prior notification to Beijing was "specious."
China's abrupt cancelation of a Thanksgiving visit to Hong Kong by the carrier Kitty Hawk and refusal to grant minesweepers shelter from a storm had rattled the Pentagon and senior naval officers.
From the US point of view it was obviously not a friendly act, but Washington these days goes out of its way to put a positive spin on anything China does. Gates said that this incident, as well as China's earlier test of an anti-satellite weapon, were possibly indications of "a disconnect within the Chinese government."
Was Gates really serious about this? Decisions to test an anti-satellite weapon or deny port visits are not spur of the moment acts. These usually have to go through layers of high level decision-making and can hardly be attributed to a political-military disconnect.
Washington is obviously not happy but, at the same time, keen to contain any serious damage to its relations with China.
Gates himself has said: "I don't consider China an enemy and I think there are opportunities for continued cooperation in a number of areas."
In Washington's delicate China diplomacy, Taiwan tends to get the rap now and then as with Rice's sharp rebuke. But it is not all negative for Taipei.
It can take comfort from Gates' reaffirmation of US resolve to help Taiwan defend itself against a Chinese attack.
He said in his news conference that: "In those conversations [with Chinese leaders during his November visit], they raised at various levels our arms sales to Taiwan, and I was very explicit that our arms sales were consistent" with US law and diplomatic commitments.
The point, though, is that unless Taiwan reinforces its identity in national and international terms, it will be absorbed by China in due course of time.
The referendum on UN admission might not produce immediate results in terms of membership, but it would pronounce Taiwan's determination to exercise its sovereign right to pursue its international interests. And it might make it difficult for China to claim responsibility for Taiwan.
It would also make it difficult for President Chen Shui-bian's (
Chen might be painted in China and, sometimes, in the US as a dangerous provocateur, but there is certainly a method to what he would like to achieve to solidify Taiwan's sovereign identity -- notwithstanding his unpopularity as demonstrated in legislative elections.
And one has to hand it to him that, even at this point in his political life, he is daring to go against all sorts of pressures from within and outside the country, particularly from the US.
Taiwan is at a very vulnerable point in its history. For the first time there are strong internal political forces, such as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), that are keen to work out solutions with China that will compromise Taiwan's sovereign status.
There is no ambiguity about what China wants. Beijing has offered talks now and then, but based on its "one China" policy. Under this scenario, it is only a question of when Taiwan will become part of China.
By advocating a referendum on UN membership, Chen is seeking to involve Taiwanese in the future of their country. This is their democratic right.
It is not just that some in Taiwan's polity appear sympathetic to Beijing's overtures; China has also made great inroads into Taiwan's business establishment, which is attracted by that county's vast internal market and low-cost manufacturing.
Chen is apparently making a last ditch effort to rally Taiwanese to put a brake on the unseemly haste with which important figures in Taiwan's political and business establishment are courting China.
Why the US should oppose a referendum in Taiwan when seeking to promote democracy in the world is baffling to say the least.
Sushil Seth is a writer based in Australia.
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
US president-elect Donald Trump is inheriting from President Joe Biden a challenging situation for American policy in the Indo-Pacific region, with an expansionist China on the march and threatening to incorporate Taiwan, by force if necessary. US policy choices have become increasingly difficult, in part because Biden’s policy of engagement with China, including investing in personal diplomacy with President Xi Jinping (習近平), has not only yielded little but also allowed the Chinese military to gain a stronger footing in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. In Xi’s Nov. 16 Lima meeting with a diminished Biden, the Chinese strongman signaled little
RSS