More than 80 percent of the residents of Taiwan want this country to be a member of the UN. As both of you have recognized in the past, this country is a sovereign nation.
According to international law, the best definition of a sovereign nation appears in the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States signed in Uruguay on Dec. 26, 1933. According to this treaty, a sovereign state has four characteristics: a permanent population; a defined territory; government; and capacity to enter into relations with other states. Taiwan clearly has all four of these characteristics. In addition, the people of Taiwan freely and democratically elect the nation's government.
This clear unity among the people of this nation in desiring to participate in the UN has been lost in partisan bickering. I urge you both to put aside partisan interests and to concentrate on national interests.
To demonstrate to the world the desire of the Taiwanese to belong to the UN, I would urge a three-point agreement that you:
* Put aside the issue of "name" and do not refer to "Taiwan" or the "Republic of China." Instead, you can refer to "this country."
* Put aside the issue of whether this country shall "join the UN" or "return to the UN." Rather, you can refer to "participating in the UN."
* Urge all voters to support both UN referendums in the March 22 election.
With both of you supporting the two referendums, it is highly likely that they will pass. This will send an important message to the world that this nation is a sovereign nation that both wants and deserves to be a member of the UN. Failing to pass the referendums would send exactly the wrong message.
Such an agreement would also go a long way toward diminishing political division in Taiwan and help to forge a new national unity.
Professor Bruce Jacobs,
Taiwan Research Unit,
Monash University
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS