Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
Buoyed by President Chen Shui-bian's (
Hsieh has met figures from across the political spectrum, including those with whom he has seemingly little in common, such as New Party Chairman Yok Mu-ming (
Hsieh has also been shooting off policy ideas with gay abandon, and while his new found freedom must be refreshing to DPP supporters worried by his hermit-like pre-Jan. 12 behavior, he will need to watch his back, as some of his ideas are likely to raise the hackles of hardcore DPP members.
Talking to Chen about shelving the referendum on entering the UN under the name Taiwan, suggesting Ma could be his premier and a softer line on cross-strait economic exchanges may all sound like reasonable propositions to many taking into account the political landscape, but they are anathema to many in the DPP.
The "independence or nothing" crowd will find it extremely hard to keep quiet if Hsieh carries on in this vein, but if they use their heads and consider the bigger picture, they will realize staying silent is the best course of action.
The DPP is still recovering from the disaster that was former chairman Yu Shyi-kun's two years in charge, when deep green elements ruled the roost and hounded dissenting voices or those who dared to criticize leaders or policy out of the party set-up. This did untold damage to the party, most notably during last year's legislative primaries, when several very capable -- but moderate -- lawmakers were labeled "bandits" and replaced with far less impressive figures, producing disastrous results.
The party needs to relearn the value of tolerating different opinions if it is to survive, as there is no political party in the world where every member has the same view on every subject. For evidence of this it need look no further than the KMT, which over the years has seen numerous splits and spin-off parties formed as a result of factional fighting. Nevertheless, the deserters eventually came back into the fold and the KMT's success in keeping potential rebels and dissenters silent ahead of the recent legislative polls arguably contributed to its performance.
Hsieh has done well since he took the helm, but he has just 58 days to achieve his goal. To do that he will need the full support of the whole pan-green camp in his battle against a revitalized KMT.
Hsieh knows the DPP cannot and will not win the presidential election by continuing to appeal only to its core supporters -- the 40 percent who will back the party come rain or shine. It needs to win back voters put off by the party's recent excesses if it is to stand any chance of victory in March.
Maximizing the party's appeal in such a short time while keeping dissenting voices in check will be a tough task, but Hsieh has got to perform if he wants to extend his political career into April.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS