Taiwan's plan to hold a referendum on joining the UN under the name of "Taiwan" has challenged the US position on Taiwan's status.
American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Chairman Ray Burghardt and AIT Director Stephen Young, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian Affairs Thomas Christensen, Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have criticized Taiwan's move.
The US has publicly opposed Taiwan's referendum, saying that Taiwan is unilaterally changing the "status quo," destabilizing peace in the Taiwan Strait and provoking China. The US opposition is baseless.
First, who defines the "status quo" on each side of the Taiwan Strait?
Second, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) stated clearly during his New Year address that over the past seven years the number of missiles deployed along China's southeast coast aimed at Taiwan has increased fivefold, from 200 to over 1300.
Yet the US has done nothing against the Chinese military buildup against Taiwan -- a unilateral change of the "status quo" in the Taiwan Strait, a "status quo" that the US wants Taiwan to unilaterally adhere to.
Chinese military buildup clearly destabilizes the peace across the Taiwan Strait.
Third, who would believe that conducting a referendum on entering the UN, an internal affair about self-determination, is a provocative act to neighboring countries?
A Zogby poll conducted last September concluded that the vast majority (81 percent) of Americans said the US should respect every country's right to UN membership based on the principles of democracy and self-determination.
US opposition to the referendum goes against the basic American principles of democracy and human rights. Washington is in a very awkward position. It is joining hands with China, an authoritarian country, to suppress a democratic state, Taiwan.
This is entirely contrary to the character and tradition of the US, a country that has shed tears and blood to tirelessly promote democracy and liberty around the world.
What the US has done has helped empower the communist Chinese establishment, not stabilize the Taiwan Strait, with an unabashed attempt to deprive the Taiwanese of their constitutional right to hold a referendum, just because the democracy in Taiwan has become a serious threat to the survival of the regime in China.
This will backfire and threaten the stability and peace in the Far East. The national security and interests of the US will be adversely affected as well.
US opposition to Taiwan's referendum on joining the UN is anti-democratic and interferes with Taiwan's internal affairs.
It is time that Washington listens to the US people and adopts a "one China, one Taiwan" policy.
It is time that Washington practices what it has been preaching by siding with a democratic Taiwan, establishing formal US-Taiwan diplomatic relations and supporting Taiwan's entry into the UN.
Gaines C. Ho
McLean, Virginia
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS