The introduction of new electoral rules for the upcoming legislative election have different implications for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The KMT seems to be more confident about the changes for two reasons. The new electoral system -- combining single-member districts with the allocation of at-large seats to parties proportional to the number of votes they receive -- favors the KMT because of its stronger organizational framework and local connections. KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (
The party's complacency is demonstrated by KMT headquarters' decision to call on voters to boycott its proposed referendum on anti-corruption to be held with the legislative elections. Its aim now is not just to become the majority force in the next legislature, but to secure an absolute majority.
The DPP, on the other hand, has struggled in the campaign because of both external and internal constraints. The lack of an impressive record in the past seven-and-a-half years is the key reason why support has been steadily dropping. Despite DPP Chairman and President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) nationwide campaigning, the number of seats the DPP wins could be less than 45 out of a total of 113.
What's even worse is the potential conflict within the DPP concerning the role of presidential candidate Frank Hsieh(謝長廷), who has been criticized by some of his comrades for not campaigning aggressively enough for his party's candidates.
Hsieh's camp has argued that his actions merely reflected a division of labor between Chen, Hsieh and other DPP big shots.
Whether the claims are true or not, Hsieh cannot turn his back on the DPP's possible losses in the legislative elections. Despite his insistence on conducting his own campaign, he should treat the legislative polls as closely associated with the presidential election in March.
If the DPP suffers a major loss, Hsieh will have to rebuild party morale by appealing to the approximately 40 percent of voters who support the pan-green camp. It would be wishful thinking to believe the voters will automatically split their ballots in both legislative and presidential elections and embrace the concept of a "divided government."
Not to mention that the KMT would certainly take advantage of a victory in the legislative elections by calling for a "unified government" to end the years of executive-legislative standoff.
If this were the case, Hsieh would need strong support from DPP voters while at the same time soliciting more ballots from middle-of-the-road voters.
The DPP would have no choice but to reinforce its campaign on protecting Taiwan's sovereignty by emphasizing its referendum to use the name Taiwan in applying to join the UN. President Chen and other leaders would hope to play the referendum card to consolidate the DPP's central power while Hsieh tried to strike a balance between playing to the DPP center and attracting moderate voters.
Hsieh is well-known as a master of political taichi and a key advocate of the principles of "reconciliation and coexistence." He will probably try to highlight the differences between his and Ma's personality and leadership skills as his major campaign strategy after the legislative polls, but is that enough?
The irony is: Hsieh still needs support from his own party and there is no way for him to separate himself from Chen.
Unless Hsieh can come up with a broader and more dominant agenda than the referendum, he will have to work closely with the DPP.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS