The Chinese-language China Times has mobilized a group of academics to condemn the renaming of the erstwhile Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall, calling it political revenge that will lead to more conflict, instead of promoting transitional justice. They even say that President Chen Shui-bian (
One of the academics, a National Chengchi University professor, claimed that Chen is harping on about the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) stolen assets to divert attention away from his corruption case. The professor suggests that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) should establish a commission to unearth the truth behind incidents that occurred during the martial law period.
These academics have distorted the DPP's pursuit of transitional justice, saying it is only an election trick and a smokescreen for Chen's personal political crisis.
But this is not true. Based on investigations conducted by the Cabinet's Research, Development and Evaluation Commission in conjunction with experts on Taiwanese history, the National Archives Administration held an exhibition on documents related to the 228 Incident in March 2001. In the same year, the Compensation Foundation for Improper Verdicts published a book on the legal and historical aspects of political incidents during the martial-law era. Subsequently, in June 2003, the 228 Memorial Foundation held a seminar to discuss recently discovered historical materials related to the 228 Incident. This led to the release of the Report on the Responsibility for the 228 Incident in February 2006, which found that Chiang was primarily responsible for the incident. This should be the most significant reference in the handling of the memorial hall.
Moreover, the Council for Cultural Affairs has operated the Green Island Human Rights Memorial Park for several years, and the military turned a former detention center in Taipei City into Jingmei Human Rights Park last month. Those who are concerned with the issue can criticize the government for its slow and inadequate efforts, but they should not discredit such efforts unless they do not support transitional justice.
I have been among those who criticized the government for doing too little, too slowly. However, having participated in the process and observed it closely, it has become impossible for me to criticize the government. Since the transfer of power in 2000 entailed only the replacement of high-ranking officials, the bureaucratic system still runs according to the old methods.
What is worse, the special legislation necessary for the investigation of truth and responsibility has been boycotted since the 1990s by the pan-blue camp, which enjoys a majority in the legislature.
Admittedly, the transformation of Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall into National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall was somewhat flawed. Still, we should accept this in light of the political environment. It is notable that even Chiang's great grandson, Demos Chiang (
Chen Yi-shen is an associate research fellow at the Institute of Modern History at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS