THERE WAS CONCERN last year that the annual Taipei 101 New Year's Eve fireworks display would not push through because of opposition from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-controlled city government, which was worried that the central government would use the occasion to promote its "UN for Taiwan" bid. After the conflict was resolved, Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (
The show went on as scheduled. After the show, the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) criticized the city government for the air pollution caused by the number of barbecues hold that night. The EPA would have done better to take a look at the pollution caused by the massive fireworks.
Prior to the festivities, the media was full of guidelines on the best locations to view the fireworks display, telling the public to avoid down-wind locations as they would be enveloped by smoke. Unfortunately, the densely packed residential areas to the south-west of Taipei 101 are vulnerable to northeasterly winds. While tourists praised the show, local residents had to put up with the smell of smoke and gunpowder seeping inside their homes. While the air pollution caused by the fireworks will eventually dissipate, the cost of putting up such a lavish display is a burden that future generations must bear.
Shallow politicians construct false images of prosperity with resplendent shows to cover up their inadequacies. In an M-shaped society like Taiwan's, those who struggle on the margins hope that the ephemeral joys of the fireworks display can dull 365 days of hardship.
Finding joy at the expense of others seems to be a common thread in this society. In the last two years, Xinyi District has had to cope with the crush of hundreds of thousands of people during the New Year's Eve celebrations despite advanced preparations to divert traffic flow. By 7pm or 8pm, the surrounding areas were completely congested: Motorbikes not only blocked the entrance of apartment buildings, but were also parked in the middle of roads.
While the celebrations ended just after midnight, many were unable to get home until sunrise. Public complaints about the congestion describe the New Year's fireworks an annual nightmare. While Xinyi District has skywalks that serve as emergency service routes, local residents have nothing to fall back on: Were an emergency to occur, are helicopters supposed to land on residential rooftops to provide assistance?
Similar situations are played out across the city because of improper urban planning. The Taipei City Government boasts of the Maokong Gondola attracting millions of tourists. However, the pride of former Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Hau was built at the expense of residents of Qixia Community (棲霞山莊), who must suffer the noise pollution and loss of privacy. Meanwhile, tourists have to pray for luck and hope they don't get stuck halfway through the ride. And, the much-vaunted tourism boost for the area's tea plantations has yet to come true.
Despite this failed experience, there are now proposals to build a similar cable car system in Beitou -- ignoring the threat it poses to the area's ecology and traditional hot-spring culture.
Building a new sports arena next to the old cigarette factory in Songshan District is an even more ridiculous project. Once finished, there will be two sports arenas within 2km of each other -- the only difference being the new one would be able to host baseball games.
Very few city councilors are brave enough to oppose the project because of concerns over votes from baseball fans. Baseball games that can draw a crowd of more than 5,000 occur only about 10 times a year, so constructing a 40,000-seat arena is not really necessary.
In the end, the sports arena will be used for concerts held by foreign pop stars and for business events of large corporations. In fact, two-thirds of the floor space and investment capital will be taken over by the already ubiquitous shopping mall or other business facilities.
It would be far better to preserve this rare green space and turn it into a second forest park with a community baseball field. Such a plan would be more effective in raising the quality of life in the city and encourage the public to participate in sports activities.
Capitalism creates enormous business opportunities. However, a government that is lacking in creativity and power of execution becomes lost in the marketing of popular trends. The public needs a smart political party that can see through the trap of buying votes through ill-conceived policies -- a party that knows how to spend money where it matters so that society can enjoy the benefits.
Pan Han-shen is the secretary-general of the Taiwan Green Party and a part-time lecturer at Aletheia University.
TRANSLATED BY ANGELA HONG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS