Five years ago, after a landslide victory put Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki in power, a vast crowd gathered in Nairobi's Uhuru Park to hear their new president vow to purge corruption.
The departing president's convoy was pelted with mud and former Kenyan president Daniel arap Moi was jeered with cries of "thief" by Kenyans who had triumphantly flexed their electoral muscles. Some called it their "second liberation."
Two years ago, Kenya's voters demonstrated their independence once again, by giving Kibaki a bloody nose in a referendum to extend his powers.
The tragedy of Kenya's elections last year is that it nearly completed the revolution that began in 2002. A relatively youthful opposition, which cut across ethnic lines, was sweeping the board -- and the political victims included men like David Mwiraria, who was implicated in corruption, Nicholas Biwott, one of Moi's most feared allies and the former president's son, Gideon Moi.
There was talk of elderly hippos being overtaken by young cheetahs. It smelled like a new era.
Instead, it appears that a government caught napping by a groundswell of opposition support has tried to interfere with the result at the last minute. There are parallels across Africa.
In Ethiopia in 2005 the opposition made dramatic gains, but was denied power amid claims that the vote was tampered with after the polls had closed. Similarly, Nigeria's elections last year were criticized for large-scale rigging.
There is speculation in Kenya that the ruling party may have sought to manipulate the electoral commission before the poll, but reports by election monitors point to meddling with the vote tallying. Kenya has set the worst of examples.
The violence is even more dismaying. The government's claim that it is "well-planned, financed and rehearsed" by the opposition was exaggerated. Kenya is not Rwanda, and this is no orchestrated genocide. But there may be a grain of truth in the claim that the opposition Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) has a role in the bloodshed.
Kenya, in common with many impoverished developing world countries, has plenty of young thugs available for hire.
David Anderson, director of the African Studies Centre at St. Antony's College, Oxford, said: "The ODM is causing as many fires to break out in as many places as possible so the government is kept on the run and forced to come to the negotiating table. Raila [Odinga] is saying he doesn't want violence. That may be true in his heart -- but not in his head."
Kenya's future lies with two men who were once allies. In 2002, Odinga, now opposition leader, helped Kibaki win. By 2005, he led a Cabinet rebellion against Kibaki, quitting power to call for a vote of "no" in the referendum.
Odinga ostensibly quit on a point of principle, but he was also frustrated at his lack of influence in government and felt he had been cheated. That history makes it unlikely that he will gladly seek a compromise now.
Kibaki unquestionably has a fine mind. He was top of his class at Uganda's respected Makerere University and a scholarship student at the London School of Economics. He was in a car accident and suffered a stroke on the eve of the 2002 election, forcing him to slow down. His skillful grassroots campaigning in the run-up to this election has tempered his aloof image, but he remains a distant president, even compared with the autocratic Moi.
Now 76, his style of government has been to surround himself with a trusted cabal. Some believe this clique is now egging him on.
Tom Cargill, Africa program manager at Chatham House, the international think tank in London, said: "The big problem is that Kibaki is being pushed more than he's pushing. On the other hand Odinga is getting old and knows this is his last shot. He feels outraged -- he thought he had it."
Five years ago, Kibaki was inaugurated as president in the park where Prince Philip handed power to Jomo Kenyatta in 1963, ceremonially ending British rule. After this election result, Odinga called for a million people to march on the same park on Thursday. A massive police presence kept protesters out of the center of Nairobi and prevented the gathering, but opposition leaders have said the protests will continue. Unless a compromise is reached, Uhuru Park could see blood and tears replace the joy of 2002.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
Tomorrow is the 78th anniversary of the 228 Incident. On Monday, at a meeting with the Overseas 2-28 Survivors Homecoming Group at the Presidential Office, President William Lai (賴清德) spoke of the importance of protecting the nation’s freedom and sovereignty. The 228 Incident is in the past, but the generational trauma exists in the present. The imperative to protect the nation’s sovereignty and liberty from Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aggression will remain for the foreseeable future. The chaos and budget cuts in the legislature threaten the endeavor. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have worked together to