For weeks now, the ranks of Chinese visitors to Hong Kong have swelled with a brand-new category of tourists: moviegoers.
In a response to the censoring of a film about love and betrayal in Shanghai during World War II by Taiwanese director Ang Lee (李安), Chinese movie fans have flocked by the thousands to Hong Kong to see the full, uncut version of the film Lust, Caution.
The phenomenon of so many people voting, as it were, with their feet has highlighted the public's rapidly changing attitudes toward the long unquestioned practice of government censorship of the arts, and prompted debate about the way films are regulated in China.
Travelers have made their way to Hong Kong to see movies before, of course, but always in much smaller numbers. Critics and commentators in China attribute the interest in Lee's movie to a variety of factors, from word of mouth about risque sexual content stripped from the censored version, to a sensitive political subtext rarely seen in Chinese cinema, to the fame of the Academy Award-winning director.
Perhaps most important, though, is the rise of a class of affluent urbanites in China's rich eastern cities who have grown increasingly accustomed to ever more choice in their lives.
"I went to Hong Kong with my girlfriend to see Lust, Caution because it was heavily censored here," said Liang Baijian, 25, a businessman and stock market investor from the Guangxi autonomous region. "We could have bought a pirated copy of the movie here, but we were not happy with the control and wanted to support the legal edition of the film."
At least one Chinese movie fan has tried to sue the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television, which regulates the industry, for deleting some of the film's content. Ang Lee has said the censored material was regarded as politically unacceptable in Beijing because it reinforced the notion of sympathy between a young Chinese woman and a collaborator with the Japanese occupiers. The lawsuit has been rejected by Beijing courts.
Many in the Chinese film industry support the idea of introducing a ratings system like the one used in the US, which advocates say would lessen the need for outright censorship. The state film administration, however, has resisted thus far.
Other travelers to Hong Kong, meanwhile, said they accepted the rationale of a censorship system in a country of stark disparities in regional income and education, but thought the practice was no longer justified in cities.
"For myself, I strongly object to censorship, but for the country as a whole, I think I can still understand its necessity," said Yan Jiawei, a graphics designer from Shanghai who saw Lust, Caution on a recent business trip to Hong Kong. "It has something to do with people's educational level. In big cities like Shanghai, people will treat the deleted scenes as art, while those in less developed areas will only think of them as immoral."
People within the movie industry here said the fact that a censored Lust, Caution was available at all in China demonstrated how far the parameters of the acceptable have broadened since the beginning of the reform era more than two decades ago. Not long ago, local film was dominated by plots heavy-handedly reinforcing conventional lines between good and bad. Unquestioned love of country was a favorite theme.
While many have been drawn to Lust, Caution by the allure of sex scenes, even more groundbreaking is the notion of a traitor in a leading role depicted as an attractive character instead of a villain.
"The country has undoubtedly become more and more open and advanced, and this is the tide of history, which no one can prevent," said Fang Li (方勵), a leading producer. "Compared to a market economy that's developing so fast, I've never seen an industry in China as backward as the film industry, though."
Fang said much of the blame for this lay with the censors, a group of mostly elderly people who work in committee and invite critical comment from branches of government, from the Women's Federation to provincial governments, all seeking to present their constituency in the best light and to avoid offense.
The censors "spend most of their time worrying how not to lose their post," he said. "They are very careful not to make mistakes."
Other critics of the system said the country's censors have become much more careful about leaving fingerprints. Wu Di (
"Now, under the so-called harmonious society, they wouldn't do things so baldly," Wu said.
Instead of publishing a banning notice, the same result is achieved today with a few phone calls, which leave little trace.
Li Yu (
"People who make movies in China understand the situation well, and a lot of them are criticizing the system, saying that censorship prevents them from making good movies, which is partly true," Li said. "But I feel the environment is becoming more and more relaxed."
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS