On Oct. 12, the Norwegian Nobel Committee announced that it was awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to former US vice president Al Gore and the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
They were given the award for their "efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change."
The IPCC is a scientific intergovernmental body set up by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the UN Environment Program (UNEP). It is responsible for assessing "the latest scientific, technical and socio-economic literature produced worldwide" with relevance to the problem of climate change.
Thanks to the efforts of the IPCC, the UN has been able to pay greater attention to the risks of global warming. In 1992, it passed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), building a fundamental framework through which the international community can address global warming.
To further reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the UNFCCC member states passed the legally binding Kyoto Protocol on Dec. 11, 1997.
The Kyoto Protocol is a control agreement restricting greenhouse gas emissions and reducing the impact of climate change on the environmental ecology.
Article 3 of the protocol states that the signatory 38 industrialized countries and the EU have to reduce their overall greenhouse gas emissions to at least 5 percent below 1990 levels during the five-year commitment period between next year and 2012.
According to Department of Health statistics, Taiwan in ranked 22nd in the world in terms of total carbon dioxide emissions in 2005. From the perspective of sustainable global development, Taiwan is also a member of the global village, and thus has the responsibility and obligation to participate in the global reduction of carbon dioxide emissions.
From the perspective of the relationship between rights and obligations, it is true that Taiwan is not a UN member state, nor is it a member state of the UNFCCC.
UN environmental protection agreements are thus not binding for Taiwan. But given Taiwan's economic strength, the UNFCCC member states will likely expect Taiwan to fulfill the relevant obligations.
As only a UNFCCC signatory, Taiwan is unable to participate in diplomatic negotiations and discussions about the flexibility mechanisms for the reduction of greenhouse gases and cannot make its voice heard on the international stage. However, after agreements are made, Taiwan is forced to accept the decisions.
This state of affairs makes it clear that it is necessary for Taiwan to gain UN membership. This is the only way that the international community will pay attention to the opinions and rights of Taiwanese.
Chen Lung-chu is the chairman of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS