In three days of talks on economic issues last week, a half-dozen Cabinet members of the administration of US President George W. Bush and their aides sat in rows of tables facing their Chinese counterparts in an ornate conference room. The talk was polite, the atmosphere convivial and the pledges of cooperation profuse.
But it was also obvious to the US side that relations with China were going through a difficult phase, with discord sometimes crowding out the areas of agreement. The Chinese frequently threatened retaliation over actions that displeased them, in the political and military spheres as well as the economic.
Despite agreeing to open markets to US exports and services, in recent months China has imposed new curbs in other areas. Though the Bush administration was pleased with Beijing's cooperation in negotiations on North Korea's nuclear program, it has remained frustrated with Chinese policies on Iran.
"The wheels in the US-China relationship are wobbly right now," said Michael Green, a professor of international relations at Georgetown University and former Asia affairs director at the National Security Council.
"They're not coming off, but they're wobbly," he said.
The strain of the relationship is all but certain to last through the presidential campaign, with both Democratic and Republican candidates accusing the Bush administration of being soft on China.
That criticism follows a recurring pattern. In 1992, Bill Clinton, then the governor of Arkansas, accused former president George Bush of "coddling" the Chinese. As president, Clinton became less confrontational. In the 2000 election then Texas governor George W. Bush belittled the administration's efforts to treat China as a "strategic partner."
After the talks last week, Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson, who led the administration team here, said that the US had made significant progress in getting China to open its economy despite "backsliding" in many areas.
"Sure, it's two steps forward and maybe sometimes one and a half back, but there's progress," he said in an interview on Thursday before returning to Washington.
He acknowledged that the Chinese might be retaliating against actions by the US, but he said this was not unusual.
Even as the Chinese agreed to cooperate on food safety, financial services and the like, they are issuing a flood of regulations that have had the effect of blocking imports in other areas.
As for retaliations, a legal challenge by the US at the WTO to get China to crack down on the piracy of movies, music and software is apparently what led the Chinese this month to ban imports of the latest Hollywood movies.
Similarly, although there were accords last week on food safety, criticism in Washington of Chinese food safety practices have led China to halt imports of US beef, poultry and pork.
In the security area, there were pledges of harmony in October when Secretary of Defense Robert Gates visited Beijing, but China reacted to the subsequent sale of missiles to Taiwan by canceling permission for a Thanksgiving holiday shore leave in Hong Kong for sailors on the US aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk.
US officials say that the Kitty Hawk episode may have been caused by the People's Liberation Army's acting independently of the Chinese leadership, which seemed to be embarrassed by it, said a senior administration official who requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly.
"They felt that the fact that the missile sales were not brought up during the Gates visit was a slap," the senior official said.
The administration is especially furious about Iran.
While the latest National Intelligence Estimate found that Iran had suspended its efforts to develop nuclear weapons in 2003, the administration maintains that Iran's continuing enrichment program -- which Tehran says is for peaceful purposes -- could be used to make such weapons in the future and thus should be blocked.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has in the past won Chinese support for UN Security Council sanctions against Iran for pursuing uranium enrichment. But her aides say China has undermined the sanctions.
European governments and banks have drastically cut back on export credits, financial transactions and energy deals in Iran in the last year. But China has filled the gap, European and US officials say. This week the biggest Chinese refiner, Sinopec, signed a deal to develop the Yadavaran oil field in Iran.
Paulson said he was particularly upset about reports of the Sinopec deal, saying, "It flies in the face of the spirit of the UN sanctions that China supported."
The senior administration official in Washington said it was important to remember that China had cooperated in several areas of vital interest, including North Korea, Sudan and Myanmar.
Crucial to China-US relations, the official said, is the relationship between Bush and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤).
When Bush told Hu this year that he would be attending a ceremony in Congress for the Dalai Lama, the Chinese seemed to appreciate his straightforwardness.
"There's always a concern by China that we don't want them to succeed, that we want to keep them down," the official said. "But I've watched President Bush with the Chinese. He has really built this relationship up. Despite the problems, it's a very, very workable relationship."
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
RSS