THE DAY BEFORE the inscription dazhong zhizheng (大中至正) was taken down from the main gate at the National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall, an ETTV cameraman was run over by a truck. The whole country could see on the news how the cameraman was dragged in under the truck, while his colleagues cried as they filmed and photographed the incident. This shows the danger that journalists face, and how they are often torn between humanitarian and professional ethics. It's very distressing. But off-screen lurks a tragic reality.
Reading each of the four major national newspapers on Dec. 8, three of them had a picture of the terrible scene and the badly injured cameraman on the front page. Such stark news images being violently pushed by the media is precisely what the French post-modernist Jean Baudrillard mentioned in his writings: It was a sensational pleasure derived from images, just like the case of the dead in the mass grave in Timisoara in Romania.
The brave and professional actions of a cameraman on the front lines was treated in the same fashion as the bloody, sensational images produced when crocodile bit off the arm of a veterinarian at a zoo in Kaohsiung. Tragedies and serious accidents like this are hard to bear for a responsible news industry.
Upon opening newspapers, we were stunned to see that they published strong denouncements of this violent incident inside. Seeing this misplaced hypocrisy, we can't help asking whether the media outlets that use media violence and write up the misfortunes of a fellow journalist are really qualified to denounce the troublemakers who instigated this accident.
If they really want to denounce someone, why don't they look into the background of the troublemakers, or thoroughly investigate the motives behind the accident? Isn't faithfully reporting the actual state of affairs the most important work that people in the news industry do?
Going back to the TV news of the cameraman's accident, even though some channels pixilated the footage of the injured man, the public had to witness yet again how some channels sensationalized this tragic incident to obscure the core facts.
First, they intentionally misled viewers by proclaiming on their news scrollers that the truck driver had a pan-green background -- without checking to see if this was true.
Second, when it became clear that the driver was assisting the campaign of a pro-unification politician, some channels tried to obscure the facts by saying on their scrollers that the driver had a record of attacking Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) -- omitting the fact that the reasons for those attacks was that the driver believed Ma was not pro-unification enough.
This coverage was a textbook case of using selective exposure to hide the facts. Does this do justice to the professionalism of a cameraman who took serious risks to film a news event?
The top managers who ordered that news should be reported in this manner should be ashamed of themselves considering the risks their frontline workers face.
Lillian Wang is an associate professor of journalism at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises