Dark days at end of Empire
Dear Johnny,
I find it deplorable for British Foreign Secretary David Miliband to suggest that the UN referendum threatens cross-strait stability (Editorial: "A British warning hardly registers," Dec. 8, page 8). It is more of a threat to peace in the region for supposedly mature democracies like the UK to continue to pander to the wishes of China and give tacit blessing to its oppressive polices and warmongering.
As for the letter from my countryman (Johnny Neihu's Mailbag, Dec. 8, page 8) that appeared to ridicule Taiwanese democracy -- and I apologize to John if it was not meant in that way -- it only goes to prove the worrying trend in education we have here.
I'm afraid I don't have room to list even a fraction of the atrocities committed by Britain throughout its history. However, for those of us who learn our history courtesy of Hollywood, I have one word: Braveheart.
I would like to urge Mr Miliband and the UK government to concentrate on issues closer to home. Even without the rising taxes that make things harder to bear, the state of education, medical care, policing and general behavior and manners of a large proportion of society disappoints me at best, and on darker days, leaves me ashamed to be English.
As to how any of this involves Taiwan, would you agree, Johnny, that there is a real danger that the petty antics and name-calling between Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) will make others consider Taiwan's democracy a laughingstock?
I would urge them to concentrate on building on the things that have made Taiwan great and improving its global image on a more basic level than simply anti-China rhetoric.
It may surprise many Taiwanese to know that I have yet to find an Englishman who has even heard of Taipei 101, let alone know that it is the tallest building in the world. Unsurprisingly, all can picture the Petronas Towers; again, courtesy of Hollywood. None of my work colleagues have placed Taiwan successfully on a map and despite me having corrected them on numerous occasions, most still refer to Thailand every time I talk about my visits there or my Taiwanese wife.
Indeed, the majority only remember Taiwan as the place where their plastic toys were made in the 1970s and 1980s.
Taiwan is a fantastic, beautiful place that should be known for its stunning scenery, culture and quality of life (I know where I'll be retiring) rather than for getting involved in petty squabbles with the People's Republic of China and between its political parties.
Kevin M
Lincolnshire, England
PS: You would not believe how hard it is to get a good naicha over here. Can I have a Red Sun Tea franchise for Christmas?
Johnny replies : I don't give a rat's ass if someone thinks of Taiwan as a laughingstock if that person does not already sympathize with Taiwan's predicament -- or if that person is just plain ignorant.
I also think that you misread John's letter.
If you describe cross-strait tension as a "petty squabble," then I can call the Battle of Britain a lark with toy planes.
As for Taipei 101, I had never heard of it either until you brought it up. I suggest we call in Hollywood to make a sequel to that Petronas Towers movie. In Entrapment II: Take the Plunge, Sean Connery will illegally BASE jump from the Taipei 101 observation deck onto a nude Catherine Zeta-Jones on a parking garage roof.
That'll educate the English.
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The Taipei District Court on Nov. 1 agreed to extend the detention of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for his suspected involvement in corruption involving a real-estate project during his time as Taipei mayor. Different voices are beginning to emerge from within the TPP about how to respond to their extended leaderless situation. Following a string of scandals coming to light since early August, including the TPP’s misreporting of election campaign finances and Ko’s alleged corruption related to the Core Pacific City redevelopment project, Ko on Aug. 29 announced he would take a three-month leave of absence from