WATCHING THE RECENT TV news coverage of the government replacing the Chinese characters honoring Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) with characters honoring Taiwan's long march to freedom and democracy reminded this American observer of the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.
Although the international news media did not cover the sign change, the event surely will go down in the history books as a significant signpost in the evolution of democracy in Asia.
The news should have been front page news in the New York Times, Le Monde and major German newspapers as well, not to mention prominently featured on CNN and the BBC. But no, it seems a dishonest kayaker in Britain received more news coverage for his five-year disappearing act than Taiwan did for its act of freedom and democracy.
Let's go back to those heady days in Berlin in 1989, where a wall that had divided East and West Berlin for 28 years was dismantled amid global fanfare. The international news media was there in droves, covering every word uttered by every official on the scene, not to mention quotes and quips from bystanders and passersby, German and non-German.
Every major news outlet in the world covered the fall of the Berlin Wall because it was a momentous occasion, an historic event, and a local story with global implications.
But when a few signs in Taipei get changed to reflect a new consciousness of national identity, based on the convoluted evolution of democracy in this country, the world does not even stop to notice. Of course, there's the global warming conference in Bali, there's the British kayaker and his wife involved in a crazy insurance scam, and there's the shopping mall shooting in the US.
Old signs get changed in Taipei to reflect a new way of thinking about freedom and democracy? Who cares? As so many newspaper and TV editors and reporters outside Taiwan agree, Taiwan does not matter, never mattered and never will matter. China matters and Taiwan is invisible, they seem to believe.
The Berlin Wall coming down was a big deal. Then US president Ronald Reagan said so. All the European leaders said so. Editorials in Japanese and Taiwanese newspapers said so. Communist China, of course, where freedom did not and still does not ring, said nothing.
However, when the former CKS Memorial Hall gets an historic name change, the world hardly notices. Such a minor event is apparently no big deal for the foreign media, hardly worth mentioning for the international news media with more urgent things on their front pages.
But what happened in Taipei this month will surely be remembered here in Taiwan, in the nation's history books and in school lessons and textbooks. No, the memorial itself did not come tumbling down, no walls were demolished and nobody died during those few precious days. But a huge milestone was reached along Taiwan's freeway of national identity.
CNN should have been there, and the New York Times should have sent a reporter and a photographer over to cover the story, too. Shouldn't an influential German newspaper have put the story on its frontpage, too?
But no, Taiwan's road to democracy is not something the international media wants to travel on unless there is something sensational and headline-grabbing as army troops firing on protesters and hundreds of people dying in a bloody Tiananmen Square-like repetition. The sign changes at Liberty Square and Democracy Hall in Taiwan just don't sing loud enough for the overseas media to notice.
But they were wrong not to notice.
Something is very different in Taiwan now. An old "wall" has been dismantled.
Dan Bloom is a freelance writer based in Taiwan.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS