WATCHING THE RECENT TV news coverage of the government replacing the Chinese characters honoring Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) with characters honoring Taiwan's long march to freedom and democracy reminded this American observer of the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.
Although the international news media did not cover the sign change, the event surely will go down in the history books as a significant signpost in the evolution of democracy in Asia.
The news should have been front page news in the New York Times, Le Monde and major German newspapers as well, not to mention prominently featured on CNN and the BBC. But no, it seems a dishonest kayaker in Britain received more news coverage for his five-year disappearing act than Taiwan did for its act of freedom and democracy.
Let's go back to those heady days in Berlin in 1989, where a wall that had divided East and West Berlin for 28 years was dismantled amid global fanfare. The international news media was there in droves, covering every word uttered by every official on the scene, not to mention quotes and quips from bystanders and passersby, German and non-German.
Every major news outlet in the world covered the fall of the Berlin Wall because it was a momentous occasion, an historic event, and a local story with global implications.
But when a few signs in Taipei get changed to reflect a new consciousness of national identity, based on the convoluted evolution of democracy in this country, the world does not even stop to notice. Of course, there's the global warming conference in Bali, there's the British kayaker and his wife involved in a crazy insurance scam, and there's the shopping mall shooting in the US.
Old signs get changed in Taipei to reflect a new way of thinking about freedom and democracy? Who cares? As so many newspaper and TV editors and reporters outside Taiwan agree, Taiwan does not matter, never mattered and never will matter. China matters and Taiwan is invisible, they seem to believe.
The Berlin Wall coming down was a big deal. Then US president Ronald Reagan said so. All the European leaders said so. Editorials in Japanese and Taiwanese newspapers said so. Communist China, of course, where freedom did not and still does not ring, said nothing.
However, when the former CKS Memorial Hall gets an historic name change, the world hardly notices. Such a minor event is apparently no big deal for the foreign media, hardly worth mentioning for the international news media with more urgent things on their front pages.
But what happened in Taipei this month will surely be remembered here in Taiwan, in the nation's history books and in school lessons and textbooks. No, the memorial itself did not come tumbling down, no walls were demolished and nobody died during those few precious days. But a huge milestone was reached along Taiwan's freeway of national identity.
CNN should have been there, and the New York Times should have sent a reporter and a photographer over to cover the story, too. Shouldn't an influential German newspaper have put the story on its frontpage, too?
But no, Taiwan's road to democracy is not something the international media wants to travel on unless there is something sensational and headline-grabbing as army troops firing on protesters and hundreds of people dying in a bloody Tiananmen Square-like repetition. The sign changes at Liberty Square and Democracy Hall in Taiwan just don't sing loud enough for the overseas media to notice.
But they were wrong not to notice.
Something is very different in Taiwan now. An old "wall" has been dismantled.
Dan Bloom is a freelance writer based in Taiwan.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS