In 1898, the famous French writer Emile Zola wrote an article titled "J'Accuse" in the literary newspaper L'aurore in which he expressed his deep concern over the lack of justice in the case of Captain Alfred Dreyfus, an army officer who had been unjustly arrested and imprisoned on the infamous Devil's Island. The article generated a wide public debate and eventually led to Dreyfus' release.
Similarly, I use the expression "J'Accuse" to express deep concern about the remarks made by French President Nicolas Sarkozy during his visit to Beijing, because his statements are perpetuating the political isolation of Taiwan in the international community.
Making a statement critical of the internal democratic proceedings of Taiwan while speaking in the capital of China does not enhance democracy in Asia, but undermines it. Taiwan is a nation which has worked very hard to achieve its democracy, while China is still ruled by an authoritarian regime that is trying to undermine Taiwan's new-found democracy.
Sarkozy's words show a distinct lack of understanding of the essence and origins of "one China." It means that many Western nations recognize only one government as the government of China, even though from 1949 through the 1970s there were two governments claiming sovereignty over China.
It has never meant that Taiwan is recognized as part of China. In fact, most Western nations merely "acknowledge" or "take note" of the Chinese position. The majority of the international community does not recognize and has never accepted the Chinese position on Taiwan.
In the 1980s and 1990s, Taiwan made a momentous transition to democracy and is no longer ruled by a repressive regime claiming to rule China, but a government which is democratically elected by the people and considers itself responsible for them alone. This fact by itself warrants a reassessment of the outdated policies of the 1970s, leading to the acceptance of Taiwan as a full and equal member of the international community.
Saying that the Taiwan question must be resolved through negotiation misses the key point -- that Taiwan is trying to determine its own future through democratic means, while China is attempting to impose its authoritarian system on Taiwanese through military means.
If Sarkozy wishes to criticize unilateral initiatives then he should criticize China's military buildup opposite Taiwan, in particular the 980-plus short and medium-range missiles pointed at the nation.
The statements made by Sarkozy in Beijing play into China's hands and will embolden China's authoritarian line even further, to the detriment of democracy and stability in East Asia.
The French opposition to the UN referendum in Taiwan betrays France's own principles of "liberte, egalite et fraternite."
Under these principles, France assisted the US in its quest for international recognition in the face of repression.
It is hard to understand why Sarkozy sides with an authoritarian regime against a free and democratic nation that wishes to determine its own future.
The move by Sarkozy is at odds with attempts at the EU to develop a coherent common foreign and security policy. In particular, it contrasts sharply with German Chancellor Angela Merkel's goal of making values such as human rights and democracy an integral part of foreign policy.
I hope Sarkozy is listening and will live up to the expectations we had of him when he came to office, when there were high hopes that he would take a more principled stance in favor of human rights and democracy than his predecessor, former French president Jacques Chirac.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of Taiwan Communique
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS