ON OCT. 19, the Ministry of Economic Affairs' Investment Commission said the total amount of Taiwanese investments in China between January and September this year was US$6.85 billion.
This means that Taiwan was investing an average of NT$24.58 billion (US$761 million) per month in China during this period -- an increase of 28.8 percent compared with the same period last year. This does not include small and medium enterprise investments, individual investment in Chinese real estate or stock markets, or expenses for traveling, studying and other purposes.
To attract Taiwanese businesspeople away from China to return to investing in Taiwan, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government has offered NT$200 billion in financing loans, preferential land rental and the "Big Investment, Big Warmth" project.
From May 2002 to May last year, a total of 48 Taiwanese companies had returned, and their investments were estimated at NT$26.29 billion, with an annual output value of NT$31.55 billion, creating 5,258 jobs. But if we divide that by 48 months, the monthly investment was only NT$448 million, or about 1.8 percent of the capital invested monthly in China.
Since the government is unwilling to "suit the remedy to the illness" and refuses to differentiate wage standards for local and foreign workers, Taiwanese businesspeople choose not to come back so as not to damage their international competitiveness.
Unfortunately, not only has DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
So can Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Will such policies have an immediate effect? He promises to increase the number of Chinese tourists from 1,000 per day to 10,000 per day within four years if elected.
Even if Taiwan's hotels and facilities are capable of accommodating them all, how profitable can it be?
According to travel agency statistics, the average daily expenditure of a Chinese tourist in Taiwan is about US$30. Thus, the monthly expenditure will be NT$300 million.
The Tourism Bureau hopes the figure will increase from US$30 to US$100 per day. But even so, monthly expenditure will only increase to NT$1 billion, still insignificant compared to the money Taiwan invests in China every month.
Foreign investors come to Taiwan just to make money. With Taiwan's constantly declining competitiveness, Taiwanese businesspeople can hardly return and make a profit, and foreign investors can hardly stay as massive domestic capital is remitted to investment in overseas securities.
All this reflects one fact: There is really not too much to invest in in Taiwan, as it is difficult to profit here. Then how can Hsieh and Ma be sure that Chinese companies will come and invest?
The opening of direct cross-strait links and the lifting of the investment ceiling on China-bound investment are certainly convenient to Taiwanese businesspeople, and helps them find greater business opportunities and international competitiveness.
Still, what good will it do Taiwan? Can it create more jobs here? Can it increase the government's tax revenues? Can it improve public order and prosperity? Can it narrow the income gap? And more importantly, can it increase the nation's international competitiveness?
The answer is a resounding "no."
These measures will have the opposite effect to their intent.
The above analysis tells us that Taiwan is bleeding heavily.
Whoever stops this bleeding by reducing investment in China, or whoever transfuses more blood to Taiwan by attracting greater foreign investment to balance Taiwanese investments in China can save Taiwan.
Today, both Hsieh and Ma are incapable of achieving these goals, yet they are our only choices.
Isn't it sad?
William Kao is chairman of the Victims of Investment in China Association.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS