THE ENDLESS DEBATE regarding one-step or two-step voting is not merely a small technicality. The Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) stubbornness in insisting on two-step voting is worth a close look.
Some say the KMT was able to rule Taiwan for 50 years because in addition to the military, police and white terror, they also relied on vote buying and lies.
This is commonly said and also a "truth" passed down by our elders: The KMT wouldn't know how to run an election without vote buying. In the 50 years of its rule, the KMT built an extremely detailed network for township, village and borough chiefs, as well as agricultural and fishing association and trade union officials who were all important vote captains during elections.
According to the book A Confession of Bribery, written by a former KMT official, the function of a vote captain is to follow community registers and spend money at strategic moments to lock in votes, making it easy to estimate the number of votes prior to the election. The mystery of two-step voting, where ballots are received separately, is that it makes it simple to count the number of people who do not participate in the referendum, to report the performance back to those above, and to grasp whether the referendum will be passed.
The Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) push for reclaiming stolen party assets hits the nail on the head. The party assets are its life-blood, hence the draft statute governing stolen party assets has repeatedly failed to pass through the legislature. After East and West Germany united, Germany immediately passed legislation liquidating the party assets of the East German Communist Party -- good example of transitional justice.
In a self-proclaimed democracy like Taiwan, how can a party with assets worth billions and a party heavily in debt compete on equal footing? Can this be considered democracy?
The point of the referendum on reclaiming party assets is to force the legislature to pass the statute governing stolen party assets so that the assets can be returned to the nation by means of the will of the nation.
Due to the two-step voting procedure during the first referendum in 2004, many people were deprived of their referendum rights -- most Taiwanese failed to receive referendum ballots. Using two-step voting is a diversionary tactic used to lower the rate of voter participation and thus lower the possibility the referendum will be passed.
The "red-shirt army" is an anti-President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) movement, not a democratic movement. One-step voting is a 100 percent democratic movement. The first step to democratic progress is to allow the public to directly express their opinion on civic issues so that contentious matters are resolved through referendums. That is a democratic movement.
Hence we must appeal to the Taiwanese public to demand their city and county councilors fight pan-blue city and county councils on this issue and demand that mayors, county commissioners and county election councils restore their civic rights. If you are an incumbent legislator or a legislative candidate, please stand up for one-step voting.
Taiwan is currently in the midst of a democratic civil war. We have the power to resist despotism and move confidently toward one-step voting so that democracy can progress. Taiwan can only become a truly democratic nation if the public can directly express its opinions through referendums and use them to demonstrate the nation's collective will. This wave of democracy has come just in time.
Michelle Wang is the deputy secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Angela Hong
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS