The human rights of the world's poorest people will be violated unless Britain and other developed countries accept the need for drastic and immediate steps to prevent global warming from triggering dangerous climate change, the UN warned on Tuesday.
Calling for urgent action on a post-Kyoto agreement to reduce greenhouse gases, the UN said the risks of "ecological catastrophe" were rising and called on the West to adopt policies that would cut carbon emissions by almost a third by 2020, and by at least 80 percent by 2050.
Kevin Watkins, editor of the near-400-page human development report, said at its launch in Brazil that climate change was about more than science or economics.
"It is about social justice and the human rights of the world's poor and marginalized. Failure to act on climate change would be tantamount to a systematic violation of the human rights of the poor," he said.
The report is critical of all developed countries for their performance on cutting emissions. But it singled out the British government for failing to show enough ambition in its plan to combat greenhouse gases, citing the upward trend in emissions from the energy and transport sectors and the lack of progress in developing renewable sources of energy.
UK International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander said: "This report highlights the scale and urgency of the problem.
"The effects of climate change will hit the world's poorest hardest. If we don't tackle climate change now, we will struggle to help the world's poor build a better life for themselves and their children."
`RADICAL NEW POLICIES'
While praising the UK government for a "bold and innovative" climate change bill that would legally bind ministers to mandatory cuts in emissions, the UN said "radical new policies" -- such as carbon taxes, tougher regulations to phase out coal-fired power stations and higher vehicle excise duty for gas-guzzling cars -- would be needed if Britain was to have any chance of hitting its target of cutting carbon dioxide emissions by 26 percent to 32 percent by 2020.
There were "serious questions about the level of ambition, and about the UK's capacity to meet its own carbon reduction targets."
The report comes barely a week after British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Britain was committed to the EU target of a 20 percent cut in carbon emissions by 2020 and a 20 percent use of renewables for energy by the same date.
In the summer the Guardian uncovered government documents saying the 20 percent target was unachievable and ways should be found to undermine it at a European level.
The UN report said that: "Britain also lags far behind best EU practice on renewable energy: it currently produces only 2 percent of its overall energy from renewables."
Climate change has moved up the political agenda in Britain, with the government seeking to find ways of cutting greenhouse gas emissions without harming prospects for economic growth. Ministers believe that a mix of energy sources, including nuclear and renewables, will be needed in the future and that greater fuel efficiency in aviation can offset the impact of the expansion of Heathrow.
The UN report criticized the government for excluding shipping and aviation from the UK's target. Taken together, the UN said, the two sources of greenhouse gases would increase the UK's carbon budget by 27 percent by 2050, canceling out half of the planned 60 percent reduction.
"Emissions targets in the climate bill are not consistent with the objective of avoiding dangerous climate change," it said. "If the rest of the developed world followed the pathway envisaged in the UK's climate change bill, dangerous climate change would be inevitable."
OUTCOME
The outcome, the UN said, would be greenhouse gas concentrations rising to 660 parts per million (ppm) to 750ppm by 2050, giving possible global temperature increases of 4oC to 5oC, well above the 450ppm and 2oC temperature rise that experts say warming must be kept within.
The report said that the UK was on track to meet its Kyoto Protocol targets because emissions are 5 percent lower than in 1990, the base year. But it says all the reductions were achieved before 2000. Now coal consumption in power generation is rising again and carbon emissions have been increasing since 2000.
"The upshot is that the national target of reducing CO2 emissions to 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2010 is unattainable; the likely outcome is a reduction less than one-half this target," it said.
The report said the UK should phase out highly polluting power stations and rapidly increase the use of renewable energy, particularly wind and tidal power, and consider higher fuel taxes and vehicle excise duty as a way of curbing the use of heavily polluting cars.
It also said that energy use in British homes remained "highly inefficient," with the average house using four times as much energy as new ones. This offered a big opportunity for carbon reductions, it added.
"Rising emissions from transport also reflect weaknesses in the public transport infrastructure and a decline in the cost of private transport, relative to public transport," the report said.
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS