Karen Jespersen is so new to her job as Denmark's minister of social affairs that she felt compelled to apologize to a visitor that she couldn't identify the painter of the canvases hanging in her offices because she still has her predecessor's furnishings. It was a rare admission, for Jespersen does not often apologize.
Since her appointment to the post in September, she has emerged as a stalwart defender of a country's right to require immigrants to accept its basic values and, inevitably, a lightning rod in Europe's continuing debate over immigration. And for a former student leftist, prominent journalist and former official with the Social Democratic Party, her new role in the conservative government of Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen represents the latest step in a remarkable personal odyssey.
Jespersen's defenders say that, sooner than most here, she had read Scandinavia's discomfort with immigration laws that overburdened schools and social programs, and even threatened law and order. But her opponents cast her as an opportunist.
"I think that Karen Jespersen chose to leave the Social Democrats when she eyed a chance to gain influence and become a minister in the right-wing government by speaking against the party and the government she was part of," said Henrik Dam Kristensen, a spokesman for the Social Democrats.
Jespersen disagrees, of course, arguing that her migration from left to right grew primarily out of her concern about the impact of immigration on Denmark.
"I think immigration is a benefit for society," she said. "But you have to be very cautious in dealing with it, to keep your basic values."
Most Danes favor immigration, she said, but refuse to surrender the achievements of their society.
"We will keep the equality of men and women and freedom of speech," she said.
Like most of northern Europe, Denmark has been in a quandary over immigration, notably from Muslim countries.
In 2004, the Dutch film director Theo van Gogh, who made a short film critical of the treatment of Muslim women, was shot and knifed to death on an Amsterdam street. A year later, the Danish daily newspaper Jyllands-Posten published cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad in an unflattering light, sparking violent protests throughout the Muslim world.
DEATH THREATS
In September, several Danish cities offered asylum to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a former member of the Dutch parliament and collaborator of van Gogh. She had fled to the US after receiving death threats from Muslim groups but returned to Europe recently, after the Dutch government refused to pay for her protection in the US.
She declined the Danish offers and said she intended to go back to Washington.
Jespersen is hard to label. At 60, she is a veteran of 1960s counterculture struggles, a women's rights advocate, a skilled politician who has sat in Denmark's parliament and has been a minister in Social Democratic governments.
The conservatives, who are expected to retain power in parliamentary elections on Nov. 13, regard her as someone who lends validity to their restrictive immigration laws. The Social Democrats, while denouncing her, realize that her Saul-to-Paul shift reflects in some way the state of the Danish soul, torn between its traditional values of tolerance and the fear that continued, unrestrained immigration will somehow tear apart the national fabric.
Unlike many in the party she represents, Jespersen did not come from privilege. Her parents divorced early and she was raised by her mother, who ran a food store. Jespersen says she was deeply influenced by her mother, who she said had "little education, but was a hard worker, and for her, justice was a strong word."
"I had a strong connection to the values I received from her: equality, responsibility," she said.
After studying history and archaeology at Copenhagen University, she followed her passion for social justice into politics, writing for a leftist political journal that set her on a path to a career in journalism, first for an academic journal and later for Danish television, where in the 1980s she earned a reputation as an astute interviewer.
Danish newspapers, admiring her aggressiveness, called her "the smiling killer."
She met the man she would marry, Ralf Pittelkow, when they were both leftist students in the early 1970s. Before that, Jespersen had lived as a squatter with other feminist students. She moved into a commune with Pittelkow, who would later alternate between academia -- teaching literature -- and politics, where he became an adviser in the 1990s to the Social Democratic prime minister, Poul Nyrup Rasmussen.
UP THE RANKS
Jespersen also rose through the ranks of the Social Democrats, winning a seat in parliament in 1990 and serving as interior minister and social affairs minister later in the decade. By 2001, she was out of government, and by 2004, at the Social Democrats' annual conference, she broke with the party over immigration.
"I gave a speech about Turkey," she said. "I was against Turkey becoming a full member of the European Union. I don't think we can cope with it. It's a very large country, with very different values. I said we should at least have a referendum, that there would be a great migration."
Her role in immigration issues grew, even after the collapse in 2001 of the leftist government and its replacement by the current government. In October 2004 a lecturer at Copenhagen University was beaten by a gang of Muslims who accused him of having read parts of the Koran to non-Muslim students.
In 2005, Jyllands-Posten, which by then had hired Pittelkow as a columnist, published the Muhammad cartoons.
In response to the reaction in the Islamic world, Pittelkow and Jespersen published a book, titled Islamists and the Naive in which they went so far as to assert that some qualities of Islam could also be found in Nazism and communism. It became a best seller.
The book did not equate the movements, she said, "but they had in common that one truth was in the world, and that one truth goes deeply into your private life."
"Not all Muslims are reading the Koran in that sense, but those who interpret it this way are growing fast, in organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah, though I am convinced we can isolate them. I think we are letting down freedom-loving Muslims if we are not fighting the radical Islamists," she said.
In addition to sharply limiting immigration, the government has enacted laws to prevent honor killings, which still occur in Muslim families.
If a teenager is ordered to perform such a killing to avenge the honor of a female relative, she said, parents and even uncles and aunts are held liable.
Jespersen denies that her transformation represents a betrayal of principle.
"My core values are the same," she said. "I thought there was room for my core values in Social Democracy, but I find there is more room among the conservatives."
Fully half of the students of immigrant background in Denmark leave school without a diploma, she said. "I was called a right-winger, but I said we are letting children down who have a weak background."
"I see a bounce back to my youth," she said. "People say, `What a long journey you've made.' And I say, `I don't look at it in that way.'"
Her husband, Pittelkow, agrees.
"Her mother had a big influence on her," he said. "And her mother had a saying, `Behave yourself, but don't put up with anything.'"
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS