The brutal murders of Carnegie Mellon University associate professor Chen Wen-chen (陳文成) in 1981 and of former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Lin I-hsiung's (林義雄) family members in 1980 have aroused debate again.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has promised that he will open up new investigations into these unsolved cases if he is elected president, while blaming the DPP for doing nothing about the cases during the seven years it has been in power. However, Ma's claims are not true.
From my personal experience I know that the DPP government has spared no efforts in its attempts to collect evidence over the past seven years in the hope that the truth would be uncovered and justice brought to the victims' families.
After assuming the chairmanship of the Cabinet's Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC) on May 20, 2000, I immediately instructed the Preparatory Office of the National Archives Administration (NAA) -- which was officially established in October of the following year -- to form a task force of academics and NAA staff members divided into several sub groups to collect documentation related to the 228 Incident, the Kaohsiung Incident and other unsolved political crimes of the authoritarian era, including the Chen and Lin cases.
A total of 53,000 documents were collected related to the 228 Incident, but they were still incomplete because so many years had passed and many of the victims had not been officially tried in court.
Despite that, we could still see that when Executive Administrator Chen Yi (陳儀) came to Taiwan he monopolized power over the military government, plundered the public and deprived them of their political rights. Some of the documents show how badly the KMT government treated the Taiwanese people, including Taiwanese, called banshan, who had moved to China during the Japanese colonial period and had returned together with the KMT. Some of the documents, however, did not coincide with the truth.
For instance, the dean of the College of Liberal Arts at National Taiwan University, Lin Mao-sheng (林茂生), was recorded as serving a four-year jail sentence in Tainan, when in fact he had been murdered. Academics wrote articles based on these documents and the "Tahsi Files" that were uncovered.
We also collected 10,000 documents related to the Kaohsiung Incident that described how prisoners made confessions against their will and emotional pleas in military court. These showed how the KMT authorities sharpened their swords prior to the incident and how they spied on prisoners' families and foreign journalists after the incident. Unfortunately, there weren't any documents saying whether or not president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) had a hand in any of the cases.
We also collected many documents from the White Terror era. Many of these were in the Chen Wen-chen Memorial Foundation's touring exhibition early this year and were given to the NAA by the Ministry of National Defense. Dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) would act as judge and jury, signing the death sentences. Pictures of the victims before and after their execution had to be submitted to Chiang.
Since the police authorities said the investigations into Chen's and Lin's cases have never been closed, the files were not transferred. I have personally inquired with the police authorities and they have indicated that the files are limited. President Chen Shui-bian (
The National Archives Act (國家檔案法), passed in 1999, regulates the NAA. During the four years I served as chairman of the RDEC, I adhered to the principle that the archives are public assets. Taiwan's transition from an authoritarian regime to a democracy and the truth about many historical incidents could be highlighted through these archives and maybe even help bring about transitional justice.
Unfortunately, the national archives are incomplete when relating to political events, including the murders of Chen and Lin's family members. Even officials at the NAA are unable to access these documents. The NAA does not have the power to force the KMT to submit all documents and is therefore unable to remedy the Act's shortcomings. However, during the three years and six months since I left, the NAA should have gathered even more material relating to political incidents. The Cabinet should demand that these be made public.
Lin Chia-cheng is a minister in the Examination Yuan.
Translated by Ted Yang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS