If Taiwan wants to become a normal country, it has to establish a normal legislature, political parties and media that do not bow their heads to the dark remainders of the past authoritarian regime. The old-fashioned legislature, political parties and media that remain controlled by old and young followers of the past regime must be encouraged to embrace freedom, democracy and independence.
January's legislative elections will offer a historical opportunity for the nation to reform the old-fashioned legislature. Some argue that Taiwan has become a two-party system, with the two parties suppressing political forces external to themselves. If these two parties really were working to protect the welfare of the public and guarantee sovereignty, there would be nothing wrong.
Alas, they are not. One of the parties ought to go back to China to run for election for a spot at the National People's Congress. It will stay in Taiwan, of course, but it's in the wrong place.
Although the other party is Taiwanese and has made considerable contributions to democracy and other forms of progress, it has not shown that same spirit of democracy in the past few years.
In the past, it took great risks and worked with the public to put an end to martial law, the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion (
That same party has regressed to the point where it has denied our nation's freedom -- which it fought for with the public -- by suddenly saying that it is "moving toward Taiwanese independence."
Although these two parties will continue their incessant bickering, they share the same mind-set: One is a fossil of a party living in the past; the other is a new party that has turned its back on progress and is headed in the wrong direction.
There are two ways for Taiwan to establish a normal legislature. One is to reform the political parties, the other is to create new parties.
When I suggested earlier in the Chinese-language New Taiwan weekly that former Presidential Office secretary-general Chen Shih-meng (陳師孟) take over as Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman, it was in the hope that the DPP would be able to win next year's legislative and presidential elections and move toward a normal legislature and a normal country.
Chen has long promoted reforming the DPP. He has academic training, a sense of mission and a strong willpower on politics.
When Su Tseng-chang (
If the nation had a left-leaning social democratic party working for fair and just representation of the middle and lower middle classes, it would help establish modern parties.
The public regard the bickering legislature as a major problem. The new electoral system, which has small districts and a dual ballot system, requires that a candidate obtain the support of half of all voters to get elected. If new candidates were to step forward to confront those representing the old mind-set, they would be certain to win.
The next legislative elections will be a battle between the new nation and an old-fashioned legislature. Now is the time for all of us to take a stand.
Ruan Ming is a consultant at the Taiwan Research Institute.
Translated by Ted Yang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS