President Chen Shui-bian (
In a national day speech in Taipei on Wednesday, Chen said: "The international community should not, in fear of China's military might, demand that Taiwan keep quiet. Nor should it, out of concern for commercial interests, turn a blind eye to China's military intimidation and diplomatic suppression of Taiwan, or to its united front economic warfare against Taiwan."
Those remarks seemed directed at US President George W. Bush because in the next breath Chen reminded listeners gathered before the presidential office building that Bush had said: "Free nations are peaceful nations, free nations do not threaten their neighbors, and free nations offer their citizens a hopeful vision for the future."
Turning his attention to China Chen demanded that Beijing "immediately withdraw missiles deployed along its southeastern coast and targeted at Taiwan, stop military exercises simulating attacks on Taiwan, abolish its so-called anti-secession law, and accelerate political and democratic reforms."
To underscore his point, Chen had the nation's armed forces parade on National Day for the first time in 16 years and included trucks hauling Hsiung Feng III (Brave Wind III) missiles.
These new missiles are capable of hitting Chinese warships in the Taiwan Strait, Chinese ports, or some of the 1,000 or so Chinese missiles deployed across the strait and aimed at Taiwan.
The National Day celebration marks the overthrow of China's last imperial dynasty, in 1911. The military parade was traditional until 1991 when it was called off in an effort to ease tensions with China.
Officials of the Bush administration recently have publicly urged and privately demanded that Chen tone down the rhetoric and actions that Washington considers provocative. Washington has repeatedly asserted that it wants the "status quo" maintained between Taiwan and China, with neither side ratcheting up threats against the other.
Until this week, Chen's government had indicated that it would heed Washington's admonitions.
Officials in Taipei had indicated they understood that, ultimately, Taiwan's continued existence separate from China depended on the US being willing to use its military power to defend Taiwan.
Chen, however, has made clear he will have none of it.
"Taiwan and the People's Republic of China are two sovereign, independent nations, and neither exercises jurisdiction over the other. This is a historical fact. This is the status quo across the Taiwan Strait," he said.
The Bush administration particularly deplored Chen's recent request that the nation be admitted to the UN as Taiwan since that would aggravate Beijing.
The application was denied but Chen said: "Our quest to gain entry into the UN will not be abandoned simply because of momentary setbacks. The Government of Taiwan will continue to pursue that goal with unwavering determination."
The State Department, perhaps taken aback by Chen's bold remarks, had no immediate comment. Similarly, no comment came right away from Beijing's official Xinhua news agency.
In Tokyo, however, the chief Cabinet secretary and spokesman for the government, Nobutaka Machimura, cautioned: "It will not help to take actions that would strengthen military tensions."
Behind Chen's strong words, said longtime Asia hands, was a desire to help Democratic Progressive Party presidential nominee Frank Hsieh (
Taiwan-US relations will most likely continue to be rocky so long as Chen is in office, according to a study by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), which prides itself on its non-partisan and apolitical assessments.
The CRS pointed to "mistrust between the Bush and Chen administrations, mixed bilateral messages, [and] a decline in the extent to which Taiwan is willing to fulfill US expectations about its own self-defense."
The analysis also noted "the fragmentation of the once powerful Taiwan lobby" in the US, a perceived declining role for Congress, and the sheer volatility of Taiwan's domestic politics.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then