Taiwan is enjoying steady economic growth on the back of stable exports, but simultaneously the country is facing a higher consumer price index (CPI) caused by rising costs for vegetables, meat and other food.
There also exists an inflation risk resulting from rising costs of imported fuel and commodities here and in most economies across Asia, including China, India, Singapore and the Philippines.
Last week, the government statistics bureau reported that the nation's CPI rose 3.08 percent last month year-on-year. That increase was the highest since October 2005, raising concerns of accelerated price pressure.
On a positive note, the CPI only rose 0.90 percent for the first nine months of this year and the index is likely to stay under 2 percent for the whole year, the statistics bureau's forecast said. The public, however, does have reason for concern as almost every daily necessity has become more expensive.
The government's monthly shopping list provides a useful example. Of the 389 items the statistics bureau officials shopped for last month for price inspection, 248 items saw rising prices, 114 items posted falling prices and 27 items were unchanged.
Consumers focus on the results of the CPI statistics because inflation can undercut their purchases. This is particularly true when stagnating wages erode purchasing power.
But what is worth noticing for financial markets and households is the stronger-than-expected rise in core CPI statistics, which grew 1.94 percent last month from a year earlier, the largest annual increase since March 2002.
This figure -- the CPI excluding more volatile components such as the prices of fruit, vegetables, fishery products and energy -- is a major gauge of inflation risk that portends trends in consumer prices and changes in the central bank's monetary policy.
The continued increase in core CPI after expanding a revised 1.60 percent in August and 1.13 percent in July suggests that inflation risk is building and that price pressure is now expanding to non-volatile consumer goods.
This situation certainly increases the odds of another interest rate hike by the central bank at its next board meeting in December. A higher interest rate would mean less valuable government bonds for investors, rising borrowing costs for businesses and more interest income for depositors.
The latest government statistics showed signs that cost-push inflation is emerging in this country because of rising energy and raw material costs. It is not demand-push inflation, in which too much money is available for too few goods.
But whether it becomes fully developed cost-push inflation remains to be seen, as other factors must be taken into account. These include whether the aggregate supply of goods and services is decreasing on continually rising production costs; whether manufacturers are running at full production capacity and cannot expand further while passing on extra costs to consumers; and whether consumer purchasing power remains weak.
While the government has attempted to rein in inflation by pushing up the value of the NT dollar and adopting a new fuel pricing mechanism, it should also pay close attention to whether suppliers, distributors, wholesalers and retailers of goods and services are exploiting consumers by hoarding goods and raising prices, especially during the post-typhoon period.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS