I have often thought to myself over the last few years that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was a great civil rights leader, but not much of a president. His administration has often seemed incompetent, duplicitous and simply adrift. At times, it has even been embarrassing and cringe-inducing . The punishment that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidates have been suffering in opinion polls would seem to bear me out to some degree.
Having witnessed the events surrounding the push for a referendum on a UN bid under the name "Taiwan," however, I think this judgement is now in need of serious modification. What US diplomats have described as crass electioneering on the part of the DPP may, in fact, be just that. Or, it may be the DPP coming to terms with its only reason for being.
The DPP is a civil-rights party that has failed to define itself on any other issue except the monumental one regarding the right of the people of this island to determine their collective fate, a right that may or may not be recognized by the UN, the US, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), China, international law, or academic theory, but which is decreed by something higher -- nature's God perhaps.
When Chen and the DPP are forced (by any of the aforementioned) on to any ground other than the fundamental question of the right to self-determination, they are out of their element and slip into confusion and even corruption, it would seem.
Therefore, what we are witnessing may in fact be an election forcing the normalization of Taiwanese politics (considering the circumstances), not a sudden break from what the US regards as the "status quo" (which seems to be a Taiwan that is devoted to manufacturing gizmos and protecting US intellectual property rights).
What is the "status quo" in East Asia anyway? New democracies in Taiwan and South Korea, a Japan slowly normalizing in terms of foreign relations and defense, a North Korean basketcase fiddling with nuclear bombs and kidnapping foreign nationals, and a China that is growing economically and militarily in a rapid, unpredictable, and opaque fashion.
The "status quo" is what anybody makes of it at any given time. It is hardly the basis for a foreign policy of a superpower with vital interests in the region.
US reservations about what is happening here are certainly understandable, as is its need for Chinese help in protecting Japan and South Korea from the regime in Pyongyang, but the US will find that it has been outmaneuvered by the "status quo" if it cannot come up with a more creative foreign policy than one that simply appeases Beijing.
Taiwanese political and economic development will be stunted and erratic so long as such fundamental questions regarding the sovereignty are kept "undecided" by the powers that have set themselves in judgement over Taiwan.
J. Tavis Overstreet
Chiayi
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS