Chinese President and General-Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Hu Jintao (
Late last month, the Chinese government pointedly expressed, through pro-Chinese media in Taiwan, its strong opposition to a Taiwan UN referendum. The report said that Hu had emphasized at a meeting of the CCP leadership that waging war against Taiwan was the only task of the Chinese military. He also proposed five phases in the CCP's use of force against Taiwan: preparation for military battle, engagement of military threats, blocking off the Taiwan Strait, all-out attack on Taiwan, and landing on Taiwan.
In the meantime, however, he also addressed six major concerns over the use of force against Taiwan: next year's Beijing Olympics could be affected, coastal business in southeast China could be harmed, China's diplomatic image could be tarnished, introduction of foreign investments could be thwarted, the risk of military casualties and a slowdown of the modernization of China.
Judging from the first part of Hu's speech, the CCP's use of force against Taiwan seems to be pending. But the statement that waging war against Taiwan is the only task of the Chinese military is a huge lie, which is only used to threaten Taiwan and comfort domestic forces. There is no way the CCP would concentrate all its military forces on the Fujian Province front line, ignoring other possible military threats. And the military also needs to cooperate with police to suppress large-scale civil uprisings in the country.
Former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) had already imitated the second phase of military threats against Taiwan, which proved to be ineffectual. Would Hu dare jump directly to the third, fourth or even the fifth phase?
Hu's six major concerns poured cold water on the Chinese military and the "angry youth," or youth displaying a high level of Chinese nationalism. His concern that war could result in huge military sacrifices serves as a direct warning to the generals who are busy making money and enjoying the fruits of a corrupt life.
There are reasons why Hu brought up his concerns. First of all, between 60 percent and 70 percent of Taiwanese consider themselves Taiwanese rather than Chinese. Even with China's opposition, more than half of Taiwanese support Taiwanese independence. It is this cohesion that deters China from invading Taiwan.
Secondly, the US government says it has a responsibility to defend the security of Taiwan.
Thirdly, the top officials in the CCP's political bureau are all civilians. If they launch a war, power will fall into the hands of the military.
Hu still has some problems controlling the armed forces. As a result, a big personnel shuffle in the armed forces was launched in the run-up to the CCP's 17th National Congress next month. The commanders in five of China's seven military regions have been replaced, while many of the generals with practical control over the forces have switched places with generals in charge of military schools in order to prevent them from holding military power for too long.
This, however, doesn't mean that the CCP will not attack Taiwan. If China's bubble economy collapses after next year's Olympics or the 2010 World Expo, the Chinese government could use external war to divert domestic focus. By that time, however, extensive civil uprisings in China might be possible, which could open the door for Taiwan to become a new country.
Paul Lin is a political commentator in Taiwan.
Translated by Ted Yang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS