Change is good when it is for the better. In the case of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (
However, when a sudden change of heart like this comes without any acknowledgement of or apology for one's previous actions, there is reason for the public to be suspicious. Why should the nation put itself in the hands of Ma, whose interest in defending the nation is ever-vacillating?
After the recent uproar when fans were prevented from waving the national flag at the Straits Cup basketball tournament in Hualien in deference to the "sensitivities" of the visiting Chinese team, Ma issued a statement pledging to defend the right of fans to display the flag.
"This behavior should not be banned, because it is the public's right to express its passion for the nation," Ma's pledge read.
Such a statement should be expected from any Taiwanese. In fact, it may seem so obvious that the brouhaha Ma's pledge sparked might have him scratching his head wondering what all the fuss is about. The answer is simple. Voters are not as forgetful or as gullible as politicians often wish they are.
Many vividly remember when the Asian Women's Soccer Championship came to Taipei City's Zhongshan Soccer Stadium in 2001. Ma, then the city's mayor, urged soccer fans not to display national flags at the games.
Then there was the Asian Short-Track Speed Skating championship in December 2005, during which Taiwanese fans were again urged by the Taipei City Government -- with Ma its head -- not to bring national flags to the venue.
The 2005 Asian Judo Championship and the 2005 International Auto Gymkhana saw this happen again, with Ma's city government -- co-sponsor of the two events -- again asking fans not to bring national flags.
Ma at the time said that he was bound by the requirements set by the Chinese Taipei Soccer Association to prevent the public from carrying national flags at competitions. The association follows the Olympic formula, an agreement reached between the International Olympic Committee and Taiwan in 1981, stipulating that Taiwan must compete as "Chinese Taipei" in the Olympics and that its teams must use a flag invented for this purpose, the "Chinese Taipei Olympic flag," instead of the national flag.
Taiwanese teams have been forced to adopt the formula at many other international sporting competitions because of pressure from China.
But what Ma has blatantly ignored is that the 1981 agreement he claims to follow does not ban spectators from displaying the national flag.
Furthermore, it was during Ma's years as Taipei mayor that the Taipei City Government invented its own demeaning "Taipei formula," calling on our spectators not to display national flags at international sports events. It is abundantly clear that this is not a person who has the guts to stand up against China's saber-rattling.
But oddly enough, this very same man, with his heart now set on winning the nation's top job next year, has suddenly had an epiphany. Enter the new, enlightened, spectator-sport-friendly Ma.
The change is good -- better late than never.
And at least Ma is being consistent on one point: His stance is always changing and he has no intention of acknowledging his past position and poor policies. That will make it easy to recognize him on the hustings, no matter how often he flip-flops.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS