The US State Department spoke out in June in opposition to the proposed referendum on Taiwan's application to join the UN under the name "Taiwan."
Last month President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) wrote UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon a letter applying for UN membership.
During Chen's recent trip to Honduras for a summit with Central American leaders, he was punished by the US government, who only granted him a 50-minute refueling stop in distant Alaska.
Clearly, it is a strong indication of US displeasure with Chen's push for a nation-wide referendum on the government bid to join the UN under the name of Taiwan.
Taiwan is a democratic country and staunch ally of the US. Make no mistake: A referendum is a domestic affair and an integral part of the system that the US and other democratic countries hold dear. Then why does the US openly interfere with Taiwan's domestic affairs and democracy?
Washington fears that Chen's push for the referendum could test the patience of Beijing, which views it as a step toward formalizing de facto independence. Washington sees it as Chen provoking China. How can the US adopt this kowtow policy to China, a country without basic human rights?
As a signatory of the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty, the US should recognize that since Japan renounced its ownership of Taiwan, the future of the country should be determined by the people who reside there.
Saying that a referendum is direct democracy which is a universal value that cannot be compromised, Chen stated, "The Taiwanese people will never accept someone drawing a red line for our democracy," and "We should not give up [the referendum] in exchange for better US transit treatment."
The message is loud and clear that for the 23 million people of Taiwan, nothing can replace their self-determination and democracy.
As the leader of the free world, it is time that the US stop opposing Taiwan's entry into the world body and stand up to support it wholeheartedly.
Gaines Ho
McLean, Virginia
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS