Washington's effectiveness at twisting Taiwan's arm hinges on the fractured nature of politics in Taiwan. If the US' latest objections to President Chen Shui-bian's (
When the referendum to enter the UN promoted by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) passes it just may mark a watershed moment in Taiwan-US relations.
It could signify the beginning of Taiwanese resolve to reclaim whatever residual control Washington still possesses over Taiwan. Much like holding free elections, referendums are another powerful tool that can be used in the struggle for further democratization.
Making the exercise of what should be a routine democratic process difficult is the inordinate number of external political headwinds. But these dynamics at times work in fortuitous ways, considering that the main catalyst responsible for the present drive for Taiwan's statehood could turn out to be none other than Beijing's relentless compression of Taiwan's international space.
To begin with, Beijing has blocked Taiwan's every move to join international bodies -- including the WHO and the UN -- that make sovereignty a pre-requisite for membership.
Taiwan's efforts to expand its membership in these bodies have invariably failed at the insistence of a ranting and bullying from Beijing.
Further exacerbating Taiwan's isolation and therefore threatening the nation's sovereignty is the dwindling number of nations that recognize Taiwan.
In response, the clamor for an affirmation of sovereignty has risen to an unprecedented level.
Where public sentiment is involved as in this case, further escalation of coercion by Bei-jing and Washington would most likely not only fall on deaf ears, but also cause a backlash.
In addition, the US State Department is reluctant to take Taiwan's democracy seriously.
The fact has not escaped Taiwanese attention that, when Washington forced Chen to make undemocratic promises such as his infamous "four noes and one without," Washington regarded Chen as a dictator much like the Chiangs.
Referendums would be the perfect forum for Taiwanese to make themselves and their democracy heard.
Washington's intention of putting a ceiling on Taiwan's democracy is often explained as necessary for regional stability. In reality, Washington is fully aware that only a sovereign and democratic Taiwan could anchor a stable Western Pacific region as long as China remains under the grip of the Chinese Communist Party.
Washington nonetheless appears to be content with manipulating Beijing's desire to take Taiwan to serve Washington's own interests, while keeping Taiwan's democracy contained.
Meanwhile, the sentiment of Taiwanese remains the wild card over which both Washington and Beijing have scant control.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS