The "Resolution for a Normal Country" that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has announced is closely related to the development of Taiwan as a nation. In my opinion, the resolution has come at the right time and we should pay serious attention to it. There are at least four points that should be considered.
The first is the historical mission of the DPP. Taiwan has arrived at an historical watershed where it may become a normal country. A responsible party has the obligation to tell the public where the difficulties lie for Taiwan and where it wants to take the country. The DPP's resolution points out that the present situation is not normal and plots a direction for the future development of the country.
But I think that the DPP has sidestepped the fact that it has restricted its own options. It was a mistake when, in order to win political power in 2000, the DPP adopted the "Resolution on Taiwan's Future."
When the DPP acknowledged and rationalized the Republic of China (ROC) and set up its government within the ROC framework, it rendered them unable to carry out thorough reforms of the distortions and mistakes of that framework. It has already been seven years since the DPP came to power and the difficulties of governing and the problems of the country are all related to the idea of the ROC.
If the DPP government does not thoroughly put an end to the ROC framework, there is no way out for Taiwan.
Second, the ROC is not the same as Taiwan. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has ruled Taiwan for half a century and the so-called Constitution of the ROC was designed to rule all of China. During the presidency of Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) several amendments were made to the Constitution that were intended to limit the jurisdiction of the ROC to Taiwan and Penghu. But the basic spirit of the Constitution as a whole, including the amendments, does not consider Taiwan a different country. It divides the ROC into a Taiwan area and a Mainland area. This means that the most fundamental law of our country, the Constitution of the ROC, does not see Taiwan as a country, but as an area.
According to this line of thinking, the ROC represents all of China and Taiwan is only a hotel that the ROC is temporarily staying in, with the ultimate goal of the unification of China. This is the KMT's legal system and it is the source of the abnormality of the constitutional government, education, foreign relations, national defense and other institutions. The chaos in Taiwan's democracy can be traced back to this, which is why we have to draft a new constitution for Taiwan.
Third, Taiwan has never been treated as a country. President Chen Shui-bian (
Instead, the name used is either the Republic of China -- a name that has become meaningless internationally and has been replaced by China -- or names like Chinese Taipei, Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Jinmen and Matzu, Taipei Economic and Cultural Office, or terms like fishing entity, health entity or meteorological entity.
Does that sound like a country? Just what do we stand for?
A famous expert in international law once said that from the way the Taiwanese government behaves, one would think Taiwan is not a country.
In other words, after living in the ROC framework for seven years, Chen has not solved the problems of the internal political chaos and the national identity crisis and neither has he changed the reality of Taiwan not being a country. Because our government internationally has never carried out any necessary legal promotion of Taiwan, or made a point of bringing up Taiwan's national rights, internationally there is no country with the name Taiwan.
Fourth, only if the ROC is brought to an end will there be a normal Taiwan. Although Lee pushed for democratic reform, he was a president within the ROC framework for 12 years. Chen has continued to be such a president for seven years. If DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) is also going to be president within this framework, and is unable to say that the most important task of the president of the ROC is to one day do away with the ROC, Taiwan's national and international political crisis will never come to an end.
The will and political decisiveness of a country's leaders will absolutely have an influence on the fate of the country. Similarly, the emergence of the collective will of the general public and the implementation of democracy can also decide the fate of a country.
If the Taiwanese do not make their voices heard, if they do not exercise their right to hold a referendum on joining the UN using the name Taiwan, and if the country doesn't change its name from the ROC to Taiwan the "status quo" will continue, until the day that both Taiwan and the ROC are destroyed by China.
Michelle Wang is the deputy secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS