The "Resolution for a Normal Country" that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has announced is closely related to the development of Taiwan as a nation. In my opinion, the resolution has come at the right time and we should pay serious attention to it. There are at least four points that should be considered.
The first is the historical mission of the DPP. Taiwan has arrived at an historical watershed where it may become a normal country. A responsible party has the obligation to tell the public where the difficulties lie for Taiwan and where it wants to take the country. The DPP's resolution points out that the present situation is not normal and plots a direction for the future development of the country.
But I think that the DPP has sidestepped the fact that it has restricted its own options. It was a mistake when, in order to win political power in 2000, the DPP adopted the "Resolution on Taiwan's Future."
When the DPP acknowledged and rationalized the Republic of China (ROC) and set up its government within the ROC framework, it rendered them unable to carry out thorough reforms of the distortions and mistakes of that framework. It has already been seven years since the DPP came to power and the difficulties of governing and the problems of the country are all related to the idea of the ROC.
If the DPP government does not thoroughly put an end to the ROC framework, there is no way out for Taiwan.
Second, the ROC is not the same as Taiwan. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has ruled Taiwan for half a century and the so-called Constitution of the ROC was designed to rule all of China. During the presidency of Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) several amendments were made to the Constitution that were intended to limit the jurisdiction of the ROC to Taiwan and Penghu. But the basic spirit of the Constitution as a whole, including the amendments, does not consider Taiwan a different country. It divides the ROC into a Taiwan area and a Mainland area. This means that the most fundamental law of our country, the Constitution of the ROC, does not see Taiwan as a country, but as an area.
According to this line of thinking, the ROC represents all of China and Taiwan is only a hotel that the ROC is temporarily staying in, with the ultimate goal of the unification of China. This is the KMT's legal system and it is the source of the abnormality of the constitutional government, education, foreign relations, national defense and other institutions. The chaos in Taiwan's democracy can be traced back to this, which is why we have to draft a new constitution for Taiwan.
Third, Taiwan has never been treated as a country. President Chen Shui-bian (
Instead, the name used is either the Republic of China -- a name that has become meaningless internationally and has been replaced by China -- or names like Chinese Taipei, Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Jinmen and Matzu, Taipei Economic and Cultural Office, or terms like fishing entity, health entity or meteorological entity.
Does that sound like a country? Just what do we stand for?
A famous expert in international law once said that from the way the Taiwanese government behaves, one would think Taiwan is not a country.
In other words, after living in the ROC framework for seven years, Chen has not solved the problems of the internal political chaos and the national identity crisis and neither has he changed the reality of Taiwan not being a country. Because our government internationally has never carried out any necessary legal promotion of Taiwan, or made a point of bringing up Taiwan's national rights, internationally there is no country with the name Taiwan.
Fourth, only if the ROC is brought to an end will there be a normal Taiwan. Although Lee pushed for democratic reform, he was a president within the ROC framework for 12 years. Chen has continued to be such a president for seven years. If DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) is also going to be president within this framework, and is unable to say that the most important task of the president of the ROC is to one day do away with the ROC, Taiwan's national and international political crisis will never come to an end.
The will and political decisiveness of a country's leaders will absolutely have an influence on the fate of the country. Similarly, the emergence of the collective will of the general public and the implementation of democracy can also decide the fate of a country.
If the Taiwanese do not make their voices heard, if they do not exercise their right to hold a referendum on joining the UN using the name Taiwan, and if the country doesn't change its name from the ROC to Taiwan the "status quo" will continue, until the day that both Taiwan and the ROC are destroyed by China.
Michelle Wang is the deputy secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS