Some people say no to drugs, some people say no to gambling and some people say no, politely, to China's bullying of Taiwan in the international arena.
It happened on a Sunday night in late July in Chiayi during the Asian Men's Volleyball Challenge Cup that featured four countries in friendly competition -- Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and China.
Before the three-day tournament got under way, local government officials had diplomatically asked townspeople and out-of-town spectators to refrain from displaying the ROC flag inside the local gymnasium where the games were to be played. It was suggested that it would be mighty sporting of everyone not to display the ROC flag so as not to upset the visiting Chinese team.
The local government issued a press release to the media urging people to "keep the national flag in their minds," instead of taking it to the games. The apparent rationale behind the city's press release was the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) agreement in 1981 that Taiwan's sports teams would use the name "Chinese Taipei," as well as a "Chinese Taipei Olympic flag" during all international events -- instead of the national flag and anthem -- in return for being allowed to participate in international sporting events.
When the tournament finally got underway, a most unexpected thing happened. Of course, some spectators brought the ROC flag with them and displayed it from the bleachers. Some other fans painted small ROC flags on their faces and proudly displayed them inside the gym. But what really caught the public's attention was a large green and red hand-made banner that was hung from the bleachers above the gym floor that read (in English only) "Taiwan! Go! -- China! No!"
Unfurled on the last night of the three-day tournament when "Chinese Taipei" was playing China, the very visible -- and striking -- banner was greeted with applause by spectators in the stands and with not one peep of protest from the visiting Chinese volleyball team or its coaches.
The banner, remarkable for both its bright colors and courageous wording, was seen on national TV news broadcasts that evening and was featured as a photograph in the next day's Chinese-language national newspapers here.
When asked what the words on the banner were meant to express, a local man, who described himself as "a citizen of Chiayi," told me: "We wanted to encourage Taiwanese people to stand up for Taiwan at this international sporting event, so the words `Taiwan! Go!' were meant as an affirmation of Taiwan as a sovereign, dignified nation. The `China! No!' part of the banner was not meant to slight or criticize the Chinese athletes who had been invited to Chiayi, but rather to say `no' loud and clear, and in plain English, to China's missiles and to China's bullying of Taiwan in the international arena."
"But we were glad to see the Chinese players in Chiayi, and we warmly welcomed them here. Spectators, during the Taiwan match with China, even applauded the Chinese players when they made skillful plays," he said.
During the three-day tournament, another citizen in Chiayi encountered some Chinese volleyball players at a neighborhood 7-Eleven store and warmly welcomed them to Taiwan, saying: "We are glad to have your as guests in our country, and we just want you to know that while we applaud your sportsmanship in playing here, we must tell you that we, as Taiwanese, do not like the way your government treats Taiwan."
The Chinese athlete who was being addressed said he understood what the man was saying, and the two men shook hands -- hands of peace across the Taiwan Strait on a sunny afternoon in Chiayi.
And the green and red banner that might have caused a ruckus, but didn't? It has been placed in a cabinet for future use, said the local man who made it.
Dan Bloom
Chiayi
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS