Presidential election time in the US may be the season for China-bashing, but it was no less astonishing that such fiery attacks on Beijing this time could come from Democrats, with that party's candidates for the nomination seemingly in a competition to out-hawk each other.
The level of rhetoric was so aggressive and uncompromising that the Republican candidates will be hard-pressed to match it.
For some time the received wisdom has been that the open-ended Iraq War would so dispirit the US public that eventually the very thought of antagonizing China over Taiwanese sovereignty would be political suicide. Instead, at best, the US military would be called on by pro-Taiwan elements in the US government to maintain the line that peace in the Pacific demands that Taiwan stay under Taiwanese control.
In this scenario China would have had the upper hand. But thanks to problems with the safety of food, medical and other exports and its inability to accommodate US objections to the yuan's exchange rate, China may have forfeited this potential advantage forever.
Even more astonishing than the Democrats' new-found bile this week was further evidence that Chinese officials consider the US dollar a potential hostage to its foreign reserves. This development, together with the fact that China will not allow the Beijing Olympic Games to loosen social and political controls, should set off alarms for US strategists.
In 2005, when Chinese Major General Zhu Chenghu (
But the same most certainly cannot be said about Xia Bin (
The most pressing concern, then, is the stupidity of a Chinese government that would induce a collapse of the greenback for political reasons. That this scenario has been so publicly and brazenly aired by experts who have Beijing's ear is ample evidence of the unpredictability -- to put it politely -- of the Chinese government on this issue.
For all the US government has said and done about reinforcing the security of the homeland against the terrorist threat, and for all of the hand-wringing that has accompanied illegal immigration and building fences on a desert border, the grim reality is that Americans are under increasing -- and increasingly acknowledged -- threat from a China that can say "go to hell."
It is this threat, not the generally limited impact of terror cells, that has the potential to hit every American where it hurts the most. The frightening thing is that China appears to revel in a situation in which it is portrayed as powerful enough to hurt people on whom it relies for growth and accumulating wealth.
No matter how much reform it may undertake, the Chinese government is proving itself incapable of shaking historical grudges -- and more than capable of repositioning those grudges from the enemies of the past to enemies of the future.
So the question must be asked: How many warnings on Chinese aggression must the US government receive before it talks and acts like it is dealing with a hostile power?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS