Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) is going to announce his running mate next week, after which the battle for the presidency will officially begin. I believe that this election will revolve around two main themes: national identity and governing accomplishments. Hsieh outshines his Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rival Ma Ying-jeou in both these categories.
Ma knows that national identity is his Achilles heel. This is why all of his recent activities -- including amending the KMT charter, memorializing Taiwanese democracy pioneer Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水), his bicycle trip around the country and his "long stay" in central and southern Taiwan -- are meant to cover up his shortcomings in these areas and win votes by creating the feeling that he is "localized." But as long as he sticks to the goal of eventual unification with China, as long as he is afraid to harshly criticize the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictatorship, and as long as the word "Chinese" remains in the KMT's title, Ma will never be able to cover up his pro-China side.
Ma's administrative achievements are also a liability. Scandals over the city government's traffic maintenance and the Maokong Gondola have all dimmed his prestige as a leader in comparison to Hsieh's achievements as mayor of Kaohsiung. The only platform of government Ma has to offer is running mate Vincent Siew's (蕭萬長) advocacy for a full embrace of China. Ma's position that Taiwan should so enthusiastically engage a hostile country to develop its economy not only demonstrates his incompetence, but also puts Taiwanese in danger.
But Hsieh also has two weak points. The first is that the DPP does not have enough party assets to compete with the KMT on campaign spending. The second is that Hsieh doesn't have Ma's good looks to win over female voters. To overcome these weaknesses, the DPP has called for a referendum on the KMT's stolen assets to wake up the public. But this will only help these shortcomings slightly, not fix the root problems.
To win more votes, Hsieh should consider choosing a woman as his running mate. The DPP does not lack outstanding female talent. The pan-green camp is an active supporter of women's movements. If it wants to compete with Ma for the female vote, it should not miss this opportunity.
As for the DPP's election methods, I support Hsieh's call for "peaceful coexistence" with China to win swing voters. He should not go for a cut-throat battle. Grass-roots voters and politicians who identify with Taiwan are the target of this "peaceful coexistence" policy. It should be clear that this is not aimed at those politicians who want to cooperate with the CCP to oppress Taiwan. Whether or not China will be peaceful depends entirely on its attitude, especially toward the nearly 1,000 missiles it has aimed at Taiwan.
Hsieh's "peaceful coexistence" policy is complemented by his "Taiwanese reform" platform. Former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) "peaceful revolution" was a reform movement. It obviously minimized the negative influences of a violent revolution, but it has left other problem that still have to be resolved, such as transitional justice. This will be a test for Hsieh in the future.
If the DPP wants to stay in power, it clearly needs to unify. Before it can peacefully coexist with the pan-blue camp, the DPP must peacefully coexist with itself. As the future leader of the pan-green camp, Hsieh should work to take on more responsibility. In the face of the "enemy," one should avoid helping one's foes by hurting one's friends.
Paul Lin is a political commentator. Translated by Marc Langer
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS